Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Mustang Forums
Mach 1
LS1 Vs. Mach 1
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="10.5secAWDTALON" data-source="post: 3756052" data-attributes="member: 18974"><p>Please tell me the 13.1 the mag ran a 2002 A4 T/A to is BS...tell my Bob Cosby who has probably raced more than you ever will is also wrong. </p><p></p><p>If there was some great time a mag ran for a Mach1 you'd be all over it, but there isn't, there's no 12.XX docummented time for one so you take the easy way out and now the mag times are BS? </p><p></p><p>They are ONLY BS when they don't use a recognized track with a standard timing system and they are also BS when then they factor in correction...NEITHER OF WHICH APPLY to the 13.1 that was ran in a heavy 2002 A4 CE T/A. </p><p></p><p>Usually the issue folks have with mag times is they are TOO SLOW...they drive like shit in some mags.</p><p></p><p></p><p>What's killing you is the fact my A4 SS is as quick or slightly quicker than an M5 Mach. It eats you up and it pisses you off so you have to go off and blather BS to cover that up. </p><p></p><p></p><p>It;'s all pretty obvious really. </p><p></p><p></p><p>:lol1: :lol1: :lol1: :lol1:</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="10.5secAWDTALON, post: 3756052, member: 18974"] Please tell me the 13.1 the mag ran a 2002 A4 T/A to is BS...tell my Bob Cosby who has probably raced more than you ever will is also wrong. If there was some great time a mag ran for a Mach1 you'd be all over it, but there isn't, there's no 12.XX docummented time for one so you take the easy way out and now the mag times are BS? They are ONLY BS when they don't use a recognized track with a standard timing system and they are also BS when then they factor in correction...NEITHER OF WHICH APPLY to the 13.1 that was ran in a heavy 2002 A4 CE T/A. Usually the issue folks have with mag times is they are TOO SLOW...they drive like shit in some mags. What's killing you is the fact my A4 SS is as quick or slightly quicker than an M5 Mach. It eats you up and it pisses you off so you have to go off and blather BS to cover that up. It;'s all pretty obvious really. :lol1: :lol1: :lol1: :lol1: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Mustang Forums
Mach 1
LS1 Vs. Mach 1
Top