Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Mustang Forums
Mach 1
LS1 Vs. Mach 1
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="10.5secAWDTALON" data-source="post: 3756154" data-attributes="member: 18974"><p>You're dumb as a box of rocks, race weight IS with driver. </p><p>Even if it did not....</p><p>Anyone with a shred of sense knows a T/A does </p><p><strong>NOT</strong> weight 3750 with no driver. Get grip on reality. :lol: </p><p></p><p></p><p>Where have you been for the last 8 years? </p><p>Under a rock???</p><p></p><p>It's a well know <strong>FACT</strong> the LS1 in the f body</p><p>was underrated by the factory. I</p><p>t's not unusual for a 2001-2002 to lay down 320 RWHP. </p><p>2001-2002 were the highest HP years due to having </p><p>the LS6 intake stock on the the LS1 motor.</p><p></p><p></p><p><strong>Here...321 RWHP...YOUR OWN MM/FF MAG....</strong></p><p></p><p></p><p><img src="http://my.voyager.net/~wcfields/Copyof01Bullitt_Article2c.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></p><p></p><p></p><p>You have SOoooooo many misconcieved ideas </p><p>and erroneous conclusions.</p><p></p><p>It is a fact...</p><p>the A4 equipted LS1 f body w/3.23 gears can </p><p>and has gone 13.0-13.1 DEAD BONE STOCK. </p><p></p><p>And a 13.1 IS DOCCUMENTED, </p><p>your piss poor understanding of that article proves</p><p> you know little about cars, LS1's or racing.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="10.5secAWDTALON, post: 3756154, member: 18974"] You're dumb as a box of rocks, race weight IS with driver. Even if it did not.... Anyone with a shred of sense knows a T/A does [B]NOT[/B] weight 3750 with no driver. Get grip on reality. :lol: Where have you been for the last 8 years? Under a rock??? It's a well know [B]FACT[/B] the LS1 in the f body was underrated by the factory. I t's not unusual for a 2001-2002 to lay down 320 RWHP. 2001-2002 were the highest HP years due to having the LS6 intake stock on the the LS1 motor. [B]Here...321 RWHP...YOUR OWN MM/FF MAG....[/B] [IMG]http://my.voyager.net/~wcfields/Copyof01Bullitt_Article2c.jpg[/IMG] You have SOoooooo many misconcieved ideas and erroneous conclusions. It is a fact... the A4 equipted LS1 f body w/3.23 gears can and has gone 13.0-13.1 DEAD BONE STOCK. And a 13.1 IS DOCCUMENTED, your piss poor understanding of that article proves you know little about cars, LS1's or racing. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Mustang Forums
Mach 1
LS1 Vs. Mach 1
Top