Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Side Pub
Making a Murderer - Netflix Series
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="WireEater" data-source="post: 15140807" data-attributes="member: 11027"><p><strong><span style="font-size: 26px"><strong>**SPOILER** Black text, highlight to reveal, unless you are on white background, you're ****ed.</strong></span></strong></p><p></p><p><span style="color: #000000">There were just a lot of things left unanswered.</span></p><p><span style="color: #000000"></span></p><p><span style="color: #000000">The whole EX boyfriend of the missing girl, deleting messages, etc. It seemed really weird to me but they didn't really focus on that too much. The whole case was quite bizarre and some of the things seemed logical and some of them just seemed a bit too far fetched. The whole thing about putting the body in the SUV only to move it to the back of the house was really interesting. Unless they were lazy as **** I don't see why they would have done that. The fact that they found some bones quite a ways from the house that matched up to what they found inside the burn pit and barrel was kind of weird as well.</span></p><p><span style="color: #000000"></span></p><p><span style="color: #000000">They also didn't seem to get too much into the vial of blood that was obviously tampered with. I know they eventually had the FBI claim that there was no traces of the preservative on the blood found in the vehicle but WHY was the sample opened, and tapped into with a syringe? The fact that the county that wasn't supposed to be involved ended up having A LOT of presence at the crime scene is pretty questionable too. I honestly feel that, while it's hard to say if he did it or not. It just seemed there would have been enough stuff in the case to at least cause a miss trial. Or the juror who just had to end up leaving the night of the verdict and to be replaced... </span></p><p><span style="color: #000000"></span></p><p><span style="color: #000000">I don't know. I know documentaries only swing one way, and are biased towards one party, this one towards Steven Avery, so maybe there was more too the case that they didn't include that would make him seem more guilty?</span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="WireEater, post: 15140807, member: 11027"] [B][SIZE=7][B]**SPOILER** Black text, highlight to reveal, unless you are on white background, you're ****ed.[/B][/SIZE][/B] [COLOR="#000000"]There were just a lot of things left unanswered. The whole EX boyfriend of the missing girl, deleting messages, etc. It seemed really weird to me but they didn't really focus on that too much. The whole case was quite bizarre and some of the things seemed logical and some of them just seemed a bit too far fetched. The whole thing about putting the body in the SUV only to move it to the back of the house was really interesting. Unless they were lazy as **** I don't see why they would have done that. The fact that they found some bones quite a ways from the house that matched up to what they found inside the burn pit and barrel was kind of weird as well. They also didn't seem to get too much into the vial of blood that was obviously tampered with. I know they eventually had the FBI claim that there was no traces of the preservative on the blood found in the vehicle but WHY was the sample opened, and tapped into with a syringe? The fact that the county that wasn't supposed to be involved ended up having A LOT of presence at the crime scene is pretty questionable too. I honestly feel that, while it's hard to say if he did it or not. It just seemed there would have been enough stuff in the case to at least cause a miss trial. Or the juror who just had to end up leaving the night of the verdict and to be replaced... I don't know. I know documentaries only swing one way, and are biased towards one party, this one towards Steven Avery, so maybe there was more too the case that they didn't include that would make him seem more guilty?[/COLOR] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Side Pub
Making a Murderer - Netflix Series
Top