Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Pics and Videos Buffet
Motortrend: 2016 Mustang GT vs. 2016 Camaro SS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="O'Neill" data-source="post: 15067027" data-attributes="member: 138778"><p>Not surprised. Am I the only one that sees almost a $10k price difference between the two? The Mustang (as tested) was $47k, which means it has to be fully loaded. That added more weight. Why didnt they test a standard baseline GT? Those things weigh 3705lbs. Why do magazines always do that?</p><p></p><p>Oh well, either way, its Motor Trend. What do you expect?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I dont ever recall Motor Trend giving the win to a Mustang. Not even when they compared it to the M3. The only thing I remember was back in 2000, when Car and Driver did a rivalry comparison between the BOSS, and the ZL1. The BOSS beat the ZL1 on the strip, but the ZL1 beat the BOSS on the track, as the BOSS was set up for the strip with an auto trans. In the end, it was a tie, and neither car won. Thats the closest thing ive seen to a Mustang winning with any magazine test.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="O'Neill, post: 15067027, member: 138778"] Not surprised. Am I the only one that sees almost a $10k price difference between the two? The Mustang (as tested) was $47k, which means it has to be fully loaded. That added more weight. Why didnt they test a standard baseline GT? Those things weigh 3705lbs. Why do magazines always do that? Oh well, either way, its Motor Trend. What do you expect? I dont ever recall Motor Trend giving the win to a Mustang. Not even when they compared it to the M3. The only thing I remember was back in 2000, when Car and Driver did a rivalry comparison between the BOSS, and the ZL1. The BOSS beat the ZL1 on the strip, but the ZL1 beat the BOSS on the track, as the BOSS was set up for the strip with an auto trans. In the end, it was a tie, and neither car won. Thats the closest thing ive seen to a Mustang winning with any magazine test. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Pics and Videos Buffet
Motortrend: 2016 Mustang GT vs. 2016 Camaro SS
Top