Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
GT40
Ford GT
MT issue with FGT vs Enzo vs CGT?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Big 8" data-source="post: 2821884" data-attributes="member: 11224"><p>You have answered the question yourself. You see 11.6 to 12.2 all over the place dont you? Thats 6/10ths difference! MPH you also have in you 10-20 tests varying as much as seven MPH!</p><p></p><p> The car has no TC no Active electronic aids for launching it etc :shrug: The car was at or below sea level. I think it was at the AZ proving grounds. So lets say 1/10th for the elevation and lets say the weather was perfect. Lets factor in 1/10th for a great track, not too much to ask, especially if you have been to more then one track. A tenth isnt anything to give from track to track. Now you get another tenth for having a pro race driver banging the gears! You would be one tenth off at this point, is it really that hard for you to imagine?</p><p></p><p> Besides if they were to have built a ringer I highly doubt it would have been simply 3mph faster and 4/10ths in the hands of a great driver. :shrug: </p><p></p><p> There is no , none, absolutly nadda ounce of proof for a ringer. Its just gossip over the internet. What happend was a great driver drove a great car to a great time. Just have to deal with it?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Big 8, post: 2821884, member: 11224"] You have answered the question yourself. You see 11.6 to 12.2 all over the place dont you? Thats 6/10ths difference! MPH you also have in you 10-20 tests varying as much as seven MPH! The car has no TC no Active electronic aids for launching it etc :shrug: The car was at or below sea level. I think it was at the AZ proving grounds. So lets say 1/10th for the elevation and lets say the weather was perfect. Lets factor in 1/10th for a great track, not too much to ask, especially if you have been to more then one track. A tenth isnt anything to give from track to track. Now you get another tenth for having a pro race driver banging the gears! You would be one tenth off at this point, is it really that hard for you to imagine? Besides if they were to have built a ringer I highly doubt it would have been simply 3mph faster and 4/10ths in the hands of a great driver. :shrug: There is no , none, absolutly nadda ounce of proof for a ringer. Its just gossip over the internet. What happend was a great driver drove a great car to a great time. Just have to deal with it? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
GT40
Ford GT
MT issue with FGT vs Enzo vs CGT?
Top