Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Side Pub
New ecoboost ford GT has worse mpg than any comparable supercar
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mc01svt" data-source="post: 15506995" data-attributes="member: 32337"><p><a href="http://www.carscoops.com/2017/01/2017-ford-gt-gets-dismal-fuel-economy.html" target="_blank">http://www.carscoops.com/2017/01/2017-ford-gt-gets-dismal-fuel-economy.html</a></p><p></p><p></p><p>The whole concept of fuel efficient supercars is an oxymoron at best but when you brag about an engine thats supposed to be lighter, more power dense and more efficient than traditional large displacement engines its pretty sad when you get worse results. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite11" alt=":rolleyes:" title="Roll Eyes :rolleyes:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":rolleyes:" /></p><p></p><p>2017 Ford GT, 3.5L TT V6 - 11/19mpg (14mpg combined)</p><p>2005 Ford GT, 5.4L SC V8 - 12/19mpg (14mpg combined)</p><p>2016 Dodge SRT viper, 8.4L NA V10 - 12/21mpg (15mpg combined)</p><p>2016 Dodge Challenger hellcat, 6.2L SC V8 - 13/22mpg (16mpg combined)</p><p>2016 Chevy Corvette Z06, 6.2L SC V8 - 13/23mpg (16mpg combined)</p><p>2016 Mclaren 675LT, 3.8L TT V8 - 16/22mpg (18mpg combined)</p><p>2017 Ferrari 488GTB, 3.8L TT V8 - 16/22mpg (18mpg combined)</p><p>2016 Porsche 911 Turbo S, 3.8L TT L6 - 17/24mpg (20mpg combined)</p><p>2016 Audi R8 V10 plus, 5.2L NA V10 - 14/21mpg (17mpg combined)</p><p>2016 Lamborghin huracan LP610-4 - 14/21mpg (17mpg combined)</p><p>2016 Mercedes AMG GT S, 4.0L TT V8 - 16/22mpg (18mpg combined)</p><p>2016 Lamborghin aventador 6.5L NA V12 - 11/18mpg (13mpg combined)</p><p></p><p>It is time to rename this engine "twin force" instead of "ecoboost." Performance of a v8, sucks fuel like a v10.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mc01svt, post: 15506995, member: 32337"] [URL]http://www.carscoops.com/2017/01/2017-ford-gt-gets-dismal-fuel-economy.html[/URL] The whole concept of fuel efficient supercars is an oxymoron at best but when you brag about an engine thats supposed to be lighter, more power dense and more efficient than traditional large displacement engines its pretty sad when you get worse results. :rolleyes: 2017 Ford GT, 3.5L TT V6 - 11/19mpg (14mpg combined) 2005 Ford GT, 5.4L SC V8 - 12/19mpg (14mpg combined) 2016 Dodge SRT viper, 8.4L NA V10 - 12/21mpg (15mpg combined) 2016 Dodge Challenger hellcat, 6.2L SC V8 - 13/22mpg (16mpg combined) 2016 Chevy Corvette Z06, 6.2L SC V8 - 13/23mpg (16mpg combined) 2016 Mclaren 675LT, 3.8L TT V8 - 16/22mpg (18mpg combined) 2017 Ferrari 488GTB, 3.8L TT V8 - 16/22mpg (18mpg combined) 2016 Porsche 911 Turbo S, 3.8L TT L6 - 17/24mpg (20mpg combined) 2016 Audi R8 V10 plus, 5.2L NA V10 - 14/21mpg (17mpg combined) 2016 Lamborghin huracan LP610-4 - 14/21mpg (17mpg combined) 2016 Mercedes AMG GT S, 4.0L TT V8 - 16/22mpg (18mpg combined) 2016 Lamborghin aventador 6.5L NA V12 - 11/18mpg (13mpg combined) It is time to rename this engine "twin force" instead of "ecoboost." Performance of a v8, sucks fuel like a v10. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Side Pub
New ecoboost ford GT has worse mpg than any comparable supercar
Top