Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Side Pub
New ecoboost ford GT has worse mpg than any comparable supercar
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mrlrd1" data-source="post: 15509930" data-attributes="member: 94513"><p>Read what I said, and do it carefully. Because this response here shows you didn't, or were just incapable of understanding.</p><p></p><p>The engine was chosen for marketing purposes. Ford could have used a mod motor based engine with all else being equal. But they didn't, they wanted to hype the "Eco"boost. The car was built to go racing, not for marketing. Nowhere did I say that the GT was built for marketing, just that the engine was chosen for such.</p><p></p><p>You're right about one thing though: the average public doesn't know about the GT. And that validates my point. Ford failed.</p><p></p><p>Edit - Nope...no marketing here:</p><p></p><p><img src="http://cdn.speednik.com/files/2015/11/2015-11-04_17-31-50.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mrlrd1, post: 15509930, member: 94513"] Read what I said, and do it carefully. Because this response here shows you didn't, or were just incapable of understanding. The engine was chosen for marketing purposes. Ford could have used a mod motor based engine with all else being equal. But they didn't, they wanted to hype the "Eco"boost. The car was built to go racing, not for marketing. Nowhere did I say that the GT was built for marketing, just that the engine was chosen for such. You're right about one thing though: the average public doesn't know about the GT. And that validates my point. Ford failed. Edit - Nope...no marketing here: [IMG]http://cdn.speednik.com/files/2015/11/2015-11-04_17-31-50.jpg[/IMG] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Side Pub
New ecoboost ford GT has worse mpg than any comparable supercar
Top