Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Side Pub
Notre Dame cathedral on fire
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Klay" data-source="post: 16178369" data-attributes="member: 45120"><p>Look, let me break this down as simplistic as I can. I said to go in without ANY preconceived notions. That means they look at all possible scenarios. I never said they go in assuming it was an accident. In fact, I am claiming to assume nothing. </p><p></p><p>Your insurance adjustor comparison doesn't compare. Insurance companies have a vested interest in it not being something they cover, so they purposely look for anything that could be construed as the customers fault. In theory, investigators have no motive behind their investigation other than to find the truth.</p><p></p><p>I would hope they wouldn't just assume it was terrorism because then everything they find will be looked at through that lens and thus cause them to potentially see evidence the wrong way.</p><p></p><p>I hope it does just turn out to be an accident but if it ends up being terrorism committed by muslims like is being insinuated here, they should be hunted down.</p><p></p><p>I have no love for the Muslim faith but I also believe in loving your neighbor. As well as giving someone the benefit of the doubt until that specific person proves otherwise. I will not stereotype whole groups based on what some in that group do. Just like I dont want to be stereotyped because of what some do in the group's I am part of.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Klay, post: 16178369, member: 45120"] Look, let me break this down as simplistic as I can. I said to go in without ANY preconceived notions. That means they look at all possible scenarios. I never said they go in assuming it was an accident. In fact, I am claiming to assume nothing. Your insurance adjustor comparison doesn't compare. Insurance companies have a vested interest in it not being something they cover, so they purposely look for anything that could be construed as the customers fault. In theory, investigators have no motive behind their investigation other than to find the truth. I would hope they wouldn't just assume it was terrorism because then everything they find will be looked at through that lens and thus cause them to potentially see evidence the wrong way. I hope it does just turn out to be an accident but if it ends up being terrorism committed by muslims like is being insinuated here, they should be hunted down. I have no love for the Muslim faith but I also believe in loving your neighbor. As well as giving someone the benefit of the doubt until that specific person proves otherwise. I will not stereotype whole groups based on what some in that group do. Just like I dont want to be stereotyped because of what some do in the group's I am part of. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Side Pub
Notre Dame cathedral on fire
Top