Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Mustang Forums
2012-2013 Boss 302 Mustang
Official GT 5.0/Boss 302 UOA thread
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Grant808" data-source="post: 14542590" data-attributes="member: 74892"><p>Fairly accurate, but could be expanded to his 'estimates' of the change in HT/HS value.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Any of the other cracked formulations too, just without the irrational hate. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></p><p></p><p></p><p>He says it's too viscous and blames it for the demise of some GT500 engines. I think the words were 'chewed up'.</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>Why, indeed. This is one of the most confusing parts of his arguments. His justification and viscosity vs. temp charts at the beginning of one of these threads that he called 'calculated for me at Widman' are comical at best. They're just plug and chug internet calculators that don't mean shit compared to actual tested values. Then he uses a bunch of circular logic to recommend and sell some oil...which I think would sell itself better if he'd just stick to the facts. </p><p></p><p>A couple of months ago, Swiss Boss proved that 10W-40 did not hold up to track use in ~85* humid weather. </p><p></p><p>That's my version of the Cliff notes.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Grant808, post: 14542590, member: 74892"] Fairly accurate, but could be expanded to his 'estimates' of the change in HT/HS value. Any of the other cracked formulations too, just without the irrational hate. ;) He says it's too viscous and blames it for the demise of some GT500 engines. I think the words were 'chewed up'. Why, indeed. This is one of the most confusing parts of his arguments. His justification and viscosity vs. temp charts at the beginning of one of these threads that he called 'calculated for me at Widman' are comical at best. They're just plug and chug internet calculators that don't mean shit compared to actual tested values. Then he uses a bunch of circular logic to recommend and sell some oil...which I think would sell itself better if he'd just stick to the facts. A couple of months ago, Swiss Boss proved that 10W-40 did not hold up to track use in ~85* humid weather. That's my version of the Cliff notes. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Mustang Forums
2012-2013 Boss 302 Mustang
Official GT 5.0/Boss 302 UOA thread
Top