Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
The Distillery
Ported Eaton Results E-85 VS 110 Octane
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="injfuel" data-source="post: 10365443" data-attributes="member: 78334"><p><strong>e-85</strong></p><p></p><p>ok im confused, everybody is defending e-85 because someone says it only made a couple more hp, said it was a wash(posi), even if it made the exact same power its still 60-70 % cheaper than 110 or c-13, yes you use a little more fuel , im more curious as to how much posi's duty cycle went up since he is still returnless and ran the exact same fuel system for both fuels, clearly premium gas is on the rise again , and if available to them, who wouldnt want an extra 15-30 hp for the same price they are paying for gas now, i mean nobody has talked about his fuel system, he has 60's, bap,modified fpdm, twin gt pumps, thats not that much for a heavily ported eaton car, i mean youn dont really get into spending alot til you talk about return style with new rails and fuel line and fittings and fore hats, seems to me that what he proved is pretty awesome for the eaton guys, if you want a race gas tune all the time and you have access to e-85 you could do it for about $900 if you shopped around for some used parts, thats starting from scratch most ported eaton guys go overkill anyway and already have a bap and fpdm and gt pumps , or maybe im just missing something LOL</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="injfuel, post: 10365443, member: 78334"] [b]e-85[/b] ok im confused, everybody is defending e-85 because someone says it only made a couple more hp, said it was a wash(posi), even if it made the exact same power its still 60-70 % cheaper than 110 or c-13, yes you use a little more fuel , im more curious as to how much posi's duty cycle went up since he is still returnless and ran the exact same fuel system for both fuels, clearly premium gas is on the rise again , and if available to them, who wouldnt want an extra 15-30 hp for the same price they are paying for gas now, i mean nobody has talked about his fuel system, he has 60's, bap,modified fpdm, twin gt pumps, thats not that much for a heavily ported eaton car, i mean youn dont really get into spending alot til you talk about return style with new rails and fuel line and fittings and fore hats, seems to me that what he proved is pretty awesome for the eaton guys, if you want a race gas tune all the time and you have access to e-85 you could do it for about $900 if you shopped around for some used parts, thats starting from scratch most ported eaton guys go overkill anyway and already have a bap and fpdm and gt pumps , or maybe im just missing something LOL [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
The Distillery
Ported Eaton Results E-85 VS 110 Octane
Top