Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Kill Drive-Thru
Ran a 5.0 tonight in my new C6 GS LS3.......
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="phatman" data-source="post: 13350938" data-attributes="member: 54580"><p>Wow! I guess a Grand National isn't an 80s style muscle car either?</p><p>But, a 78 T/A non Ws6 package would be considered a muscle car? Are you saying only cars that came with, 454s, 396s, 427s, 429s, 428, 426, 440s, 340s, 350s, 351s and possibly 302s the only muscle cars that exist? </p><p></p><p>That statement sounds like an old man who refuses to let the past go! The fact of the matter is, any American car that comes with a high performance engine could actually classify as a muscle car. Cars in the 60s were high 14 second cars and you needed steep gears, uncapped headers and a big cam to gain power. NEW MUSCLE cars are so efficient, that we can now drive our cars to the track, run 11s and drive home. </p><p></p><p>So! A GT500 with FI does not classify as a muscle car, but a Chevelle with a big blower (Forced Injection) protruding through the roof does? Can you say major contradiction!! </p><p></p><p>A new Challenger is the best looking car in this PONY CAR error, however, the Camaro, Mustang, along with the Challenger are all modern day muscle cars! Your statement is very bias. Hell, I would classify the Charger as a Muscle car, as well as my CTS-V!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="phatman, post: 13350938, member: 54580"] Wow! I guess a Grand National isn't an 80s style muscle car either? But, a 78 T/A non Ws6 package would be considered a muscle car? Are you saying only cars that came with, 454s, 396s, 427s, 429s, 428, 426, 440s, 340s, 350s, 351s and possibly 302s the only muscle cars that exist? That statement sounds like an old man who refuses to let the past go! The fact of the matter is, any American car that comes with a high performance engine could actually classify as a muscle car. Cars in the 60s were high 14 second cars and you needed steep gears, uncapped headers and a big cam to gain power. NEW MUSCLE cars are so efficient, that we can now drive our cars to the track, run 11s and drive home. So! A GT500 with FI does not classify as a muscle car, but a Chevelle with a big blower (Forced Injection) protruding through the roof does? Can you say major contradiction!! A new Challenger is the best looking car in this PONY CAR error, however, the Camaro, Mustang, along with the Challenger are all modern day muscle cars! Your statement is very bias. Hell, I would classify the Charger as a Muscle car, as well as my CTS-V! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Kill Drive-Thru
Ran a 5.0 tonight in my new C6 GS LS3.......
Top