Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Side Pub
Really? This Qualifies For "Stand Your Ground"
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HillbillyHotRod" data-source="post: 15964023" data-attributes="member: 158733"><p>True they will be shouting racist up one side and down the other over this. That being said "stand your ground" in most states says you do not have to back away and can defend yourself from attack. The guy "attacked" the shooter physically assaulting him to the point of a vicious shove to the ground. Having that happen you could assume under common sense that he would pursue the attack. Most stand your ground say you only need reasonable of fear if death or bodily harm in order to use lethal force. This was in affect once he had been thrown to the ground. This is most likely why they did not recommend prosecution. Whether he was backing up before or after he was shot I do not know, wasn't there. Once a threat is started you have the right to use force to stop it which he did.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HillbillyHotRod, post: 15964023, member: 158733"] True they will be shouting racist up one side and down the other over this. That being said "stand your ground" in most states says you do not have to back away and can defend yourself from attack. The guy "attacked" the shooter physically assaulting him to the point of a vicious shove to the ground. Having that happen you could assume under common sense that he would pursue the attack. Most stand your ground say you only need reasonable of fear if death or bodily harm in order to use lethal force. This was in affect once he had been thrown to the ground. This is most likely why they did not recommend prosecution. Whether he was backing up before or after he was shot I do not know, wasn't there. Once a threat is started you have the right to use force to stop it which he did. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Side Pub
Really? This Qualifies For "Stand Your Ground"
Top