Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Donut Shop
Refusing search?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="cohhbra" data-source="post: 11245974" data-attributes="member: 77954"><p>No you do because you have other proof I was going 100mph. Look I'm just saying that it is the suspicious person's direct disagreement with the officer smelling marijuana or anything. Like I said it sounds stupid, but then again I can see some legal loopholes in the sense that the smell of marijuana is arguable and like I said, a smell can't be brought to court. Really this is just going to depend on the officer, I'm sure that even if it is true, it would be very easy for an officer to gain access to a car that has a certain smell coming from it. So for ease of argument, in the end the smell is probable cause or will likely lead to some other source that provides probable cause.</p><p></p><p>Didn't get my post in before reading the last: Okay then, smell is probable cause.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="cohhbra, post: 11245974, member: 77954"] No you do because you have other proof I was going 100mph. Look I'm just saying that it is the suspicious person's direct disagreement with the officer smelling marijuana or anything. Like I said it sounds stupid, but then again I can see some legal loopholes in the sense that the smell of marijuana is arguable and like I said, a smell can't be brought to court. Really this is just going to depend on the officer, I'm sure that even if it is true, it would be very easy for an officer to gain access to a car that has a certain smell coming from it. So for ease of argument, in the end the smell is probable cause or will likely lead to some other source that provides probable cause. Didn't get my post in before reading the last: Okay then, smell is probable cause. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Donut Shop
Refusing search?
Top