Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Cobra Forums
SVT Shelby GT500
Roush anti-wheel hop kit
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Robert M" data-source="post: 13786893" data-attributes="member: 9628"><p>^^^This is a reason to consider the Roush, if a person is having UCA poly bushing issues, the use of the rubber in the UCA hole instead may fix that.</p><p></p><p>My comments were mainly toward the lack of advancement in the 2011-up Roush that Ford felt was necessary to incorporate from the 2010 540hp level to the 2011 550hp level. Ford spent a lot of $$$ to redesign the fuel tank in the UCA area and engineer and test the 2011-up UCA upgrades, I'm sure there was a reason for these changes? The longer arm especially....... </p><p></p><p>I do agree that the Roush is a great add over the larger marshmellow oem rubber, no question, just holding all three brackets one at a time on their sides and pulling down on each UCA showed the difference in side deflection.</p><p></p><p>I have a full 3" exhaust so maybe I am missing some noise and harmonics with my poly?</p><p></p><p>One thing I did notice...........when I had pulled the sockets to tighten the fasteners on my LCA's and UCA I thought for sure that they were tight enough, no need for more............When I put a click torque wrench on each fastener and checked each for the "correct" torque spec., I was wayyy off and needed more tightening. <<This may be where some people have problem with "clunking". Pulling the fasteners tight with a breaker bar and leverage pipe doesn't always get the torque to where it needs to be with these suspension pieces. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>R</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Robert M, post: 13786893, member: 9628"] ^^^This is a reason to consider the Roush, if a person is having UCA poly bushing issues, the use of the rubber in the UCA hole instead may fix that. My comments were mainly toward the lack of advancement in the 2011-up Roush that Ford felt was necessary to incorporate from the 2010 540hp level to the 2011 550hp level. Ford spent a lot of $$$ to redesign the fuel tank in the UCA area and engineer and test the 2011-up UCA upgrades, I'm sure there was a reason for these changes? The longer arm especially....... I do agree that the Roush is a great add over the larger marshmellow oem rubber, no question, just holding all three brackets one at a time on their sides and pulling down on each UCA showed the difference in side deflection. I have a full 3" exhaust so maybe I am missing some noise and harmonics with my poly? One thing I did notice...........when I had pulled the sockets to tighten the fasteners on my LCA's and UCA I thought for sure that they were tight enough, no need for more............When I put a click torque wrench on each fastener and checked each for the "correct" torque spec., I was wayyy off and needed more tightening. <<This may be where some people have problem with "clunking". Pulling the fasteners tight with a breaker bar and leverage pipe doesn't always get the torque to where it needs to be with these suspension pieces. R [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Cobra Forums
SVT Shelby GT500
Roush anti-wheel hop kit
Top