Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Cobra Forums
SVT Shelby GT500
Spotted!!! Gt500 Testing At Firebird Raceway!!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Formula51" data-source="post: 3433564" data-attributes="member: 19833"><p>I understand the difference in the blower and displacement and how that makes for a rather bad comparison of these motors. I was just interested in how much gain the Terminators had seen to get a ballpark. </p><p></p><p>What is the displacement of a typical ported Eaton vs. that of the blower which will be on the GT500, which I think is 122ci?</p><p></p><p>Can anyone confirm a stock longblock 03/04 at or over 520rwhp on pump gas?</p><p></p><p>I understand that 625rwhp (your number) is not an issue on pump gas with numerous different setups. I just simply wonder if it will be an issue with the stock setup as it may require some very aggressive timing and dangerous air/fuel mixtures to achieve (just a guess). Now I see no problem at all for a twin screw on a 5.4 to make 625rwhp safely on pump gas, but that is not what we are talking about here. I know the blower design on the GT500 is improved, but I bet the amount of boost you are surmising to make 625rwhp may make for some serious issues other than tunning, such as heat.</p><p></p><p>I am very excited to see what happens in the next year or so. If the GT500 engine doesn't get people excited, regardless of what they might think of the car, then they have some serious issues. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Formula51, post: 3433564, member: 19833"] I understand the difference in the blower and displacement and how that makes for a rather bad comparison of these motors. I was just interested in how much gain the Terminators had seen to get a ballpark. What is the displacement of a typical ported Eaton vs. that of the blower which will be on the GT500, which I think is 122ci? Can anyone confirm a stock longblock 03/04 at or over 520rwhp on pump gas? I understand that 625rwhp (your number) is not an issue on pump gas with numerous different setups. I just simply wonder if it will be an issue with the stock setup as it may require some very aggressive timing and dangerous air/fuel mixtures to achieve (just a guess). Now I see no problem at all for a twin screw on a 5.4 to make 625rwhp safely on pump gas, but that is not what we are talking about here. I know the blower design on the GT500 is improved, but I bet the amount of boost you are surmising to make 625rwhp may make for some serious issues other than tunning, such as heat. I am very excited to see what happens in the next year or so. If the GT500 engine doesn't get people excited, regardless of what they might think of the car, then they have some serious issues. :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Cobra Forums
SVT Shelby GT500
Spotted!!! Gt500 Testing At Firebird Raceway!!
Top