Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Mustang Forums
2012-2013 Boss 302 Mustang
Steeda Boss 302 Springs
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Gus from Steeda" data-source="post: 11285728" data-attributes="member: 126519"><p>The body roll will definitely be solved, but suspension geometry wise we could not justify lowering the car much more, it would have negated some of the handling benefits. Those could be corrected with additional parts but we chose to go this route instead so you would not be forced into additional parts. Ball joints, bump steer, etc can still be used, but are optional. </p><p></p><p>Got some feedback for you in this thread, post# 34 <a href="http://forums.themustangsource.com/f813/new-boss-302-spring-option-steeda-501907/index2/" target="_blank">New Boss 302 Spring Option From Steeda! - Page 2 - The Mustang Source - Ford Mustang Forums</a></p><p></p><p><em>Initial impressions are a lot better than I expected. I can't believe how much flatter the LS corners now and nose dive during hard braking is considerably reduced.</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>Gus, please let everyone involved with development know they did a tremendous job! </em></p><p></p><p>Some pictures on page 3 of that thread as well.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Gus from Steeda, post: 11285728, member: 126519"] The body roll will definitely be solved, but suspension geometry wise we could not justify lowering the car much more, it would have negated some of the handling benefits. Those could be corrected with additional parts but we chose to go this route instead so you would not be forced into additional parts. Ball joints, bump steer, etc can still be used, but are optional. Got some feedback for you in this thread, post# 34 [url=http://forums.themustangsource.com/f813/new-boss-302-spring-option-steeda-501907/index2/]New Boss 302 Spring Option From Steeda! - Page 2 - The Mustang Source - Ford Mustang Forums[/url] [I]Initial impressions are a lot better than I expected. I can't believe how much flatter the LS corners now and nose dive during hard braking is considerably reduced. Gus, please let everyone involved with development know they did a tremendous job! [/I] Some pictures on page 3 of that thread as well. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Mustang Forums
2012-2013 Boss 302 Mustang
Steeda Boss 302 Springs
Top