Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Donut Shop
street racing in florida
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="WTF" data-source="post: 6618080" data-attributes="member: 29178"><p>If that were the case, he could use that as his 'get out of jail' ticket and put on illegal modifications. Again, I understand both sides within that scenario, it's just that there needs to be a way to make things better after someone, who was actually innocent, is forced to jump through the hoops to prove his innocence. This is especially true for the bigger cases, such as street racing where thousands of dollars is expended just to prove one's innocence.</p><p></p><p>Edit: I guess, in a nutshell, what I'm asking for is a way to repay people that have been "accidentally" inconvenienced by LE. In a perfect world, you would have a system that would motivate LE to *only* inconvenience the public when they strongly felt someone was breaking the law, not when it was questionable. The only fair thing I can think of, is to allow the judge to grant compensation money to defendants found not-guilty, and this money comes out of the *local* budget of accusing LE department...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="WTF, post: 6618080, member: 29178"] If that were the case, he could use that as his 'get out of jail' ticket and put on illegal modifications. Again, I understand both sides within that scenario, it's just that there needs to be a way to make things better after someone, who was actually innocent, is forced to jump through the hoops to prove his innocence. This is especially true for the bigger cases, such as street racing where thousands of dollars is expended just to prove one's innocence. Edit: I guess, in a nutshell, what I'm asking for is a way to repay people that have been "accidentally" inconvenienced by LE. In a perfect world, you would have a system that would motivate LE to *only* inconvenience the public when they strongly felt someone was breaking the law, not when it was questionable. The only fair thing I can think of, is to allow the judge to grant compensation money to defendants found not-guilty, and this money comes out of the *local* budget of accusing LE department... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Donut Shop
street racing in florida
Top