Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Side Pub
Texting and Driving
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tt335ci03cobra" data-source="post: 15862195" data-attributes="member: 68944"><p>It’s arguable in court that it’s an infringement of rights. It also is argued every day and binds up the legal system with filler suits and general limp wristed cases. I don’t condone it but I also am such a strong proponent of the bill of rights that I would never bite my tongue to spite my face and open the can of worms that blocking phone use in a car would lead to. That’s a slippery slope that will impact much more than just phone use while operating a vehicle as people adopt the resultant winning defenses to win far more detrimental cases of unintentional harm. </p><p></p><p>Addiction is something easy to understand. Things become addictive when they impact our brain chemistry and develop dependence. Dopamine, and many other chemicals are key to this conversation as studies have proven they are produced in excess by tech stimulus such as social media. Facebook and other tech sites are on the record both with investors, filings, and public documents stating that they build addicting algorithms into their sites. They have various algorithms that will respond to given user profile types to better “hook” the user for as long as possible. Further, they have fake accounts known as bots that will chime in positively (or negatively) to keep people on their sites. Comments and so on from bots are indescribable from real peoples accounts, and definitely are extorted to manipulate and cause addicted users.</p><p></p><p>Look it up, Facebook and others are on the hook in the public square right now for more than just 3rd amendment issues. They are doing some intended and unintended dark spirited things.</p><p></p><p>Consider this, Bill Gates and Steve Jobs wouldn’t let their own children use unsupervised tech like iPhones or so on. Some even claim they were totally void in those kids lives.</p><p></p><p>Ask why that would be. It’s a long deep dive.</p><p></p><p>I’m not sold on the idea that there is just accidents that can kill people and there’s no need to face jail time. If it’s knvoluntary man slaughter do to negligence such as known distracted driving, I condone manditory 3yr(+ as needed) prison time.</p><p></p><p>If I open a restaurant and keep a crappy kitchen, and people get sick or die, or if it’s an unsafe environment and workers get hurt or die, it’s involunatry manslaughter.</p><p></p><p>Accountability is a good thing for society. I argue that it’s better to have law and order than snowflakes and conciliation prizes, with mild slaps on the wrist.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tt335ci03cobra, post: 15862195, member: 68944"] It’s arguable in court that it’s an infringement of rights. It also is argued every day and binds up the legal system with filler suits and general limp wristed cases. I don’t condone it but I also am such a strong proponent of the bill of rights that I would never bite my tongue to spite my face and open the can of worms that blocking phone use in a car would lead to. That’s a slippery slope that will impact much more than just phone use while operating a vehicle as people adopt the resultant winning defenses to win far more detrimental cases of unintentional harm. Addiction is something easy to understand. Things become addictive when they impact our brain chemistry and develop dependence. Dopamine, and many other chemicals are key to this conversation as studies have proven they are produced in excess by tech stimulus such as social media. Facebook and other tech sites are on the record both with investors, filings, and public documents stating that they build addicting algorithms into their sites. They have various algorithms that will respond to given user profile types to better “hook” the user for as long as possible. Further, they have fake accounts known as bots that will chime in positively (or negatively) to keep people on their sites. Comments and so on from bots are indescribable from real peoples accounts, and definitely are extorted to manipulate and cause addicted users. Look it up, Facebook and others are on the hook in the public square right now for more than just 3rd amendment issues. They are doing some intended and unintended dark spirited things. Consider this, Bill Gates and Steve Jobs wouldn’t let their own children use unsupervised tech like iPhones or so on. Some even claim they were totally void in those kids lives. Ask why that would be. It’s a long deep dive. I’m not sold on the idea that there is just accidents that can kill people and there’s no need to face jail time. If it’s knvoluntary man slaughter do to negligence such as known distracted driving, I condone manditory 3yr(+ as needed) prison time. If I open a restaurant and keep a crappy kitchen, and people get sick or die, or if it’s an unsafe environment and workers get hurt or die, it’s involunatry manslaughter. Accountability is a good thing for society. I argue that it’s better to have law and order than snowflakes and conciliation prizes, with mild slaps on the wrist. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Side Pub
Texting and Driving
Top