Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
The Blower Bistro
The relationship between cubic inches, boost and runner length.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="old01cobra" data-source="post: 15930781" data-attributes="member: 141196"><p>No I never did, I had to modify the Idle air valve location the throttle linkage and I switched to a Wide oval SVO cobra R throttle body so I never wanted to undo all this. I know if I did I would've made a little more down low and maybe a higher peak TQ. But I'm never really below 4000 especially with the 4:30s so its really no loss.</p><p></p><p>I've talked to a few other people about the NA stuff. Some have told me to widen the cams and it would allow more power to be built in the upper RPM's. I spin it out to 7300-7500 now so I really didn't want to go any higher at this point. I was originally shooting for 500rwhp NA but it is what it is.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="old01cobra, post: 15930781, member: 141196"] No I never did, I had to modify the Idle air valve location the throttle linkage and I switched to a Wide oval SVO cobra R throttle body so I never wanted to undo all this. I know if I did I would've made a little more down low and maybe a higher peak TQ. But I'm never really below 4000 especially with the 4:30s so its really no loss. I've talked to a few other people about the NA stuff. Some have told me to widen the cams and it would allow more power to be built in the upper RPM's. I spin it out to 7300-7500 now so I really didn't want to go any higher at this point. I was originally shooting for 500rwhp NA but it is what it is. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
The Blower Bistro
The relationship between cubic inches, boost and runner length.
Top