Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Pics and Videos Buffet
Unlawful arrest or idiot who can't follow lawful commands?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="svtfocus2cobra" data-source="post: 16929454" data-attributes="member: 21786"><p>I can see the merits of both sides, honestly. But when you approach someone who is an innocent bystander and you assume guilt and then violate their rights, I have to wonder about the process. Does that make it okay to violate anyone and everyone's rights as long as it is being done in the name of crime fighting? If so then we are in for a ride as the government goes on a national crime fighting spree and we are all game for arrest and questioning. That's extreme, I know, but if that is the standard then the standard is easily broken to get what you want as an officer. </p><p></p><p>Our rights are supposed to be set in stone yet an instance of a crime by someone completely unrelated means your rights are on standby. Would you ever agree to relinquishing your 2nd ammendment rights against your will when you did nothing wrong? This is a tough one for me but I lean more towards rights trump all. You better have more than suspicion to arrest an otherwise innocent person.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="svtfocus2cobra, post: 16929454, member: 21786"] I can see the merits of both sides, honestly. But when you approach someone who is an innocent bystander and you assume guilt and then violate their rights, I have to wonder about the process. Does that make it okay to violate anyone and everyone's rights as long as it is being done in the name of crime fighting? If so then we are in for a ride as the government goes on a national crime fighting spree and we are all game for arrest and questioning. That's extreme, I know, but if that is the standard then the standard is easily broken to get what you want as an officer. Our rights are supposed to be set in stone yet an instance of a crime by someone completely unrelated means your rights are on standby. Would you ever agree to relinquishing your 2nd ammendment rights against your will when you did nothing wrong? This is a tough one for me but I lean more towards rights trump all. You better have more than suspicion to arrest an otherwise innocent person. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Pics and Videos Buffet
Unlawful arrest or idiot who can't follow lawful commands?
Top