Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Pics and Videos Buffet
Well that didn't take long
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="GNBRETT" data-source="post: 15826320" data-attributes="member: 111882"><p>Yea street lawyer that is absolutely correct when ur recording SOMEONE else's conversation NOT ur own conversation. So ur 100% wrong. Feel stupid now? I do this for a living. Do u?</p><p></p><p>I always find it amusing when ppl try to quote statutes but forget to leave out the part that actually matters! lol</p><p></p><p>So u can take ur MISINFORMATION iceburg and sink with it!</p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"><strong><u>What Federal Law Says:</u></strong></span></p><p>According to the <a href="https://ilt.eff.org/index.php/Privacy:_Wiretap_Act" target="_blank">Wiretap Act of 1968 (18 U.S.C. § 2511.)</a>, it’s illegal to secretly record any oral, telephonic, or electronic communication that is reasonably expected to be private. So, for example, recording a conversation with somebody in a bedroom, with the door shut, on private property, without them knowing is technically a federal crime in the loosest sense.</p><p></p><p>There are, however, a few exceptions to this law that create some sizable loopholes. <u>The biggest being the “one-party consent” rule that says u can record people secretly if at least one person in the conversation consents to the recording, or if the person recording is authorized by law to do it (like police with a warrant). If we go back to our bedroom recording, <strong>that means you could record your conversation as long as one person—you—consents to it. Sneaky, eh? But here’s the catch: you have to actually be a part of that conversation</strong></u>. If you were simply recording two other people talking while standing nearby and not saying a word, you then have no consent from any of the parties, and thus it would be illegal.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="GNBRETT, post: 15826320, member: 111882"] Yea street lawyer that is absolutely correct when ur recording SOMEONE else's conversation NOT ur own conversation. So ur 100% wrong. Feel stupid now? I do this for a living. Do u? I always find it amusing when ppl try to quote statutes but forget to leave out the part that actually matters! lol So u can take ur MISINFORMATION iceburg and sink with it! [SIZE=4][B][U]What Federal Law Says:[/U][/B][/SIZE] According to the [URL='https://ilt.eff.org/index.php/Privacy:_Wiretap_Act']Wiretap Act of 1968 (18 U.S.C. § 2511.)[/URL], it’s illegal to secretly record any oral, telephonic, or electronic communication that is reasonably expected to be private. So, for example, recording a conversation with somebody in a bedroom, with the door shut, on private property, without them knowing is technically a federal crime in the loosest sense. There are, however, a few exceptions to this law that create some sizable loopholes. [U]The biggest being the “one-party consent” rule that says u can record people secretly if at least one person in the conversation consents to the recording, or if the person recording is authorized by law to do it (like police with a warrant). If we go back to our bedroom recording, [B]that means you could record your conversation as long as one person—you—consents to it. Sneaky, eh? But here’s the catch: you have to actually be a part of that conversation[/B][/U]. If you were simply recording two other people talking while standing nearby and not saying a word, you then have no consent from any of the parties, and thus it would be illegal. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Pics and Videos Buffet
Well that didn't take long
Top