Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Pics and Videos Buffet
well That was a bad parking job ( navy helicopter down the drain )
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="notdisturbed" data-source="post: 1004553" data-attributes="member: 6516"><p>We do need a military, only for the defense of the united states borders and to contribute to a force needed overseas when called upon and agreed on by friendly nations. </p><p>We were not attacked by one man, or by one nation, so how do you propose we fight a war? To capture bin laden we didnt need to invade afghanistan and then leave it in ruins, we did not need to invade iraq and leave it to be ruled by muslim clerics. To capture bin laden we simply needed the use of our special forces and our billion dollar technologies, but we didnt do that. Why? Because it wouldnt have been as much fun i suppose? Sure, NOW were using all this amazing technology to track him and supposedly we have him "on the run", but i dont believe a damn word our government says, esp. after the iraq "wmd" incident. Horray for capturing bin laden, boo for the way we chose to go about it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="notdisturbed, post: 1004553, member: 6516"] We do need a military, only for the defense of the united states borders and to contribute to a force needed overseas when called upon and agreed on by friendly nations. We were not attacked by one man, or by one nation, so how do you propose we fight a war? To capture bin laden we didnt need to invade afghanistan and then leave it in ruins, we did not need to invade iraq and leave it to be ruled by muslim clerics. To capture bin laden we simply needed the use of our special forces and our billion dollar technologies, but we didnt do that. Why? Because it wouldnt have been as much fun i suppose? Sure, NOW were using all this amazing technology to track him and supposedly we have him "on the run", but i dont believe a damn word our government says, esp. after the iraq "wmd" incident. Horray for capturing bin laden, boo for the way we chose to go about it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Pics and Videos Buffet
well That was a bad parking job ( navy helicopter down the drain )
Top