Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Donut Shop
What was the deal with April 1st?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="FordSVTFan" data-source="post: 8099832" data-attributes="member: 2243"><p>Indeed. Those decision were made by politicians not Law Enforcement.</p><p> </p><p></p><p></p><p>:shrug:</p><p> </p><p></p><p></p><p>And you and most of those that complain about revenue generation need to understand those decisions do NOT come from Law Enforcement. L.E.O.s job is to enforce the laws as written, regardless of the penalty or if revenue is generated. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Once you stop inferring that L.E. has anything to do with these decisions.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>There is plenty of L.E. oversight, just because the public isnt privy to their decisions doesnt mean that it doesnt occur. If you want to talk about hiding responsibility lets talk about corporate officers hiding embezzlement or M&M conferences where physicians speak of their malpractice hidden from everyone. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>That was the way it was in the beginning, all traffic offenses were criminal. It was decided through legislation and court cases that traffic offenses should be civil in nature and therefore the penalty would be a fine rather than jail time.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>And that will create a problem with people who live outside the area, those who are physically unable, as well as the cost of overseeing the labor.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>That is is a violation of the 5th and 14th Amendment's Equal Protection Clause.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I agree that is would likely be a more effective deterrent, but it would be a lot more costly and without fines where would the funds to pay these costs come from?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Yes.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="FordSVTFan, post: 8099832, member: 2243"] Indeed. Those decision were made by politicians not Law Enforcement. :shrug: And you and most of those that complain about revenue generation need to understand those decisions do NOT come from Law Enforcement. L.E.O.s job is to enforce the laws as written, regardless of the penalty or if revenue is generated. Once you stop inferring that L.E. has anything to do with these decisions. There is plenty of L.E. oversight, just because the public isnt privy to their decisions doesnt mean that it doesnt occur. If you want to talk about hiding responsibility lets talk about corporate officers hiding embezzlement or M&M conferences where physicians speak of their malpractice hidden from everyone. That was the way it was in the beginning, all traffic offenses were criminal. It was decided through legislation and court cases that traffic offenses should be civil in nature and therefore the penalty would be a fine rather than jail time. And that will create a problem with people who live outside the area, those who are physically unable, as well as the cost of overseeing the labor. That is is a violation of the 5th and 14th Amendment's Equal Protection Clause. I agree that is would likely be a more effective deterrent, but it would be a lot more costly and without fines where would the funds to pay these costs come from? Yes. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Donut Shop
What was the deal with April 1st?
Top