a 2.93 only - probably, with a 2# - a datalog is the only sure way.. Your gonna need a tune regardless, so you will find out then.
Last edited:
2.81 vs 2.93
- Thread starter SVTDom
- Start date
a 2.93 only - probably, with a 2# - a datalog is the only sure way.. Your gonna need a tune regardless, so you will find out then.
But you'll talk shit like calling peoples stuff ugly, and disputing their #'s.
Call it dyno racing, but if you don't trust my #'s, and want to dispute them, then see if your car will do as good or better. $500!?!?
Let me guess you'll more than likely be going to Pro-dyno to have your Cobra tuned when you put your ported blower on? I know I will be.
dp
Last edited:
Chill out, they are just dyno numbers. Didn't realize it was so important to ya. Lighten up, Francis!
Yeah they are just dyno #'s so they're not that important other than brag about how much HP, and lb-ft your car put down, but its annoying when people dispute that you made what you claim on a dyno. My cars a pretty strong runner for a 2.93 car, and I've had several people tell me that. It made 431 HP, and 415 lb-ft SAE on a different dyno the day before my Pro-Dyno tune, running a factory 04 Cobra tune, with the A/F ratio was all over the place. After my Pro-Dyno tune I developed a 3rd gear traction problem that was non-existant before it, and the extra power was quite noticable. I was very happy and impressed with my tune, and I'm not just talking about what the sheet says.
I'm very glad you're happy and impressed. So am I! :bowdown:
Users who are viewing this thread
