Guess it shows you don't need a high magazine "assault rifle" to protect loved ones.
Love stories like this!
Guess it shows you don't need a high magazine "assault rifle" to protect loved ones.
+1
The only thing worth killing somebody for is a direct threat to your life or someone else's. Blowing somebody away for stealing a T.V. shows a total disregard for human life. I applaud the guy in the O.P. for what he did, he exercised total control of the situation without using unnecessary violence.
Here in MI that's called murder.
Not in Texas!I thought in most states it's called murder to shoot someone over personal property.
maybe in this situation. Add another perp with both of them having guns and tell me what you would rather have.
I disagree, the safest thing to do would be let the guy go with the TV. This could of emasculated into something bad since he went after him.Good post OP. The home owner keeping a level head and taking control of the situation
Could someone who knows the law clear this up. What happens if the guy is even stupider (Thief) and walks towards the man with the gun unarmed, and gets shot? Isn't it the fault of the homeowner because he had other options? Like he could have stayed armed inside his house?
I disagree, the safest thing to do would be let the guy go with the TV. This could of emasculated into something bad since he went after him.
Now if he was inside the home....game on.
Could someone who knows the law clear this up. What happens if the guy is even stupider (Thief) and walks towards the man with the gun unarmed, and gets shot? Isn't it the fault of the homeowner because he had other options? Like he could have stayed armed inside his house?