Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Donut Shop
Crown Vic Police Interceptor Specs?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="FordSVTFan" data-source="post: 5202645" data-attributes="member: 2243"><p>Again your own lack of reading comprehension owns you, my post indicates in the first statement they are U.C. vehicles. Furthermore, I am a Fed, I dont wear a uniform except when tactical, therefore all my use is U.C. I didnt make it sound like anything other than what it was, a good use of siezed/forfeited vehicles, you interpreted the way you decided to based on your own issues with L.E. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Not bragging, I was answering a question but thanks again for following along<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite11" alt=":rolleyes:" title="Roll Eyes :rolleyes:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":rolleyes:" /> And yes, my use of these vehicles for my job was "thanks" to a felon. I understand because of your checkered past, you relate to "Felons" but that is your problem and no one elses. You made yourself look like a fool. Having the same exact information you had, JShen produced a cogent, articulate and well thought out response. You decided to jump the gun and make your position and disdain known without the requisite knowledge to do anything other than make <u>yourself</u> look foolish. It might serve you well to express fact and not feeling when trying to debate.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Again, your own lack of understanding and comprehension led to your conclusions and statements. No one responded in such a fashion. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I am not underpaid. You now say you have no problem with L.E., you need to go back and reread some of your posts, including this one.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It is not used as a "police cruiser." Once again try to follow along. Yet again this is your perception, as no one else understood my post the same way you did. You decided what it meant, based on your disdain for either L.E. or just me, but either way it was your problem as my statement was clear and in context with the questions asked. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Leaving out the FordSVTFan would actually yield pretty good results, if you were so inclined. I just did it and came up with some pretty accurate info. Now, this statement proves what an immature and reactive person you are.</p><p></p><p>Here is my post, please tell me where it says any of the things you intimate that it says</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="FordSVTFan, post: 5202645, member: 2243"] Again your own lack of reading comprehension owns you, my post indicates in the first statement they are U.C. vehicles. Furthermore, I am a Fed, I dont wear a uniform except when tactical, therefore all my use is U.C. I didnt make it sound like anything other than what it was, a good use of siezed/forfeited vehicles, you interpreted the way you decided to based on your own issues with L.E. Not bragging, I was answering a question but thanks again for following along:rolleyes: And yes, my use of these vehicles for my job was "thanks" to a felon. I understand because of your checkered past, you relate to "Felons" but that is your problem and no one elses. You made yourself look like a fool. Having the same exact information you had, JShen produced a cogent, articulate and well thought out response. You decided to jump the gun and make your position and disdain known without the requisite knowledge to do anything other than make [U]yourself[/U] look foolish. It might serve you well to express fact and not feeling when trying to debate. Again, your own lack of understanding and comprehension led to your conclusions and statements. No one responded in such a fashion. I am not underpaid. You now say you have no problem with L.E., you need to go back and reread some of your posts, including this one. It is not used as a "police cruiser." Once again try to follow along. Yet again this is your perception, as no one else understood my post the same way you did. You decided what it meant, based on your disdain for either L.E. or just me, but either way it was your problem as my statement was clear and in context with the questions asked. Leaving out the FordSVTFan would actually yield pretty good results, if you were so inclined. I just did it and came up with some pretty accurate info. Now, this statement proves what an immature and reactive person you are. Here is my post, please tell me where it says any of the things you intimate that it says [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Donut Shop
Crown Vic Police Interceptor Specs?
Top