i really like the way the cobra drives with the irs and wanted to see everyones opinion of it and if anyone on here has swaped the solid axle for it on the mach 1...
My friend did.... I think he's crazy, other than that though I am glad he did. Is ride quality your only consideration?
If you bought the car for the ride quality you bought the wrong car. If you want the car to handle, add a 3-link setup and then you will have the handling of the IRS with the traction of the SRA.
are you running the terminato t-56 with your swap? if so, how do you like having the 4.10 gears. a friend of mine is considering gears but isnt sure about 4.10.
I was JUST about to post a thread about an IRS vs a Panhard Bar/Torque Arm/FLSFC's...
I am in the same boat at the OP, my Mach is a DD so ride quality is an issue. I'm OK with my MRT street springs, no ISO's in the front and removed upper rear ISO, stock shocks.
I've been going blind doing research on a PHB/TA setup over the IRS but have not found anyone saying how well it rides. Just that you can get a SRA to perform as well as a IRS...but nothing in terms of DD comfort.
OP, I don't mean to thread-jack...but figured we could both benefit from asking questions.
No I have the stock Mach Tr3650 with a stage 3 clutch. It rips man, 4.10s in a T56 are also nice for a pullied Eaton. Also with the 5 speed 5th feels like a stock 4th gear pull. No problem.
I daily drive my Mach and I swapped for the handling as well as ride comfort. A bonus was the exhaust and me polishing my stingers.
I posted my thoughts in the sticky up top, but overall just determine what is important to you. You can build either one to be great for all around use, some just prefer the extra straight line competency of the SRA versus the more refined ride quality of the IRS.
IMO for a high horsepower street machine that may see any track use (open, drag, autocross) you can build the SRA cheaper and replace broken parts cheaper.