Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Donut Shop
Legal question regarding Police Vehicles without lights on during speed traps
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mach1USMC" data-source="post: 11259485" data-attributes="member: 42788"><p>Yup.... AND I found out that radar/laser Jammers are illegal everywhere in the U.S. since they emit a "signal." Go figure- you can't emit a signal without FCC approval therefore making it illegal- or so Google tells me.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>So if we take traffic enforcement and the traffic court out of the picture you'd be saving the city almost 3 million dollars?........ sounds like a plan to me. How do we make that a ballot initiative again?</p><p></p><p>Of course on the other hand the function of Gov't isn't necessarily to be efficient, and while it's a worthy goal to save money when and where you can it's not the gov'ts job to make $ like a business does so comparing the 2 doesn't make a lot of sense to me. Just my .02:thumbsup:</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mach1USMC, post: 11259485, member: 42788"] Yup.... AND I found out that radar/laser Jammers are illegal everywhere in the U.S. since they emit a "signal." Go figure- you can't emit a signal without FCC approval therefore making it illegal- or so Google tells me. So if we take traffic enforcement and the traffic court out of the picture you'd be saving the city almost 3 million dollars?........ sounds like a plan to me. How do we make that a ballot initiative again? Of course on the other hand the function of Gov't isn't necessarily to be efficient, and while it's a worthy goal to save money when and where you can it's not the gov'ts job to make $ like a business does so comparing the 2 doesn't make a lot of sense to me. Just my .02:thumbsup: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Donut Shop
Legal question regarding Police Vehicles without lights on during speed traps
Top