I agree. Look at his history.
View attachment 1595629
Sent from my iPhone using the svtperformance.com mobile app
Model Citizen right there! Just like GT Preemie said...
Part of the dien doo muffin crew...
I agree. Look at his history.
View attachment 1595629
Sent from my iPhone using the svtperformance.com mobile app
Read both articles and watched the video.
No racial slurs. @GT Premi is crying again for no reason.
Just because the articles both say " White man shot a black man in self defense" does not mean it was racially motivated.
Personally, if I see people parking like a complete asshole, or blocking a spot that is used for either emergencies or something else, I will say something, with or without my gun. No, it is not because I am "billy badass internetz guy" it is simply because I say what is right. It is also how you go about it and granted, the person involved had a gun.
However much I don't agree with taking a life over something so minuscule, no matter if Drejka was looking for a fight, or, kind of keeping an eye on his community despite not being law enforcement, that was a HARD shove from a much bigger guy.
Also, if ANYONE actually notices in the video -Mcglochton comes storming out of the store and immediately goes right after Drejka and pushes him damn hard, and once the guy is on the ground, he approaches him even more. It is only until Drejka drew his weapon that he backed up.
One can only speculate what could and would have happened, but, I see it as Mclochton was going to beat the crap out of Drejka, most likely because he was being a macho man protecting his woman.
All of this coould have been avoided if they either did not park in a spot to avoid any type of problem (I kind of think that they too were looking for problems by doing so and knowing what they are doing is illegal and wrong) and it also could have been avoided if Mclochton didn't come out and initiate the confrontation in such an aggressive manner that became physical. I am confident if Mclochton walked up and told the guy sorry and drove away, everyone would be going about their lives.
Two wrongs do not make a right.
The store owner could’ve criminal trespass Drejka at some point, however the resulting actions of the belligerent shooter is not the store owner’s responsibility.I'm going to say this, when you been pointed out over 4 times on causing trouble at this store, due to getting in peoples faces and telling them how you think things should be. Then yes he was causing problems that evolved into what you seen, all because he wanted to play neighborhood cop.
The one I totally blame for this is the store owner as he could of put a stop to this simply by barring Drejka from the establishment after the 2nd run in and told to pack his bags and not to return. But for what ever reason he didn't.
This thread might warm up again..
View attachment 1595606
I'll just leave this caramel popcorn here...
lol
you people...
If somebody comes in my face trying to be Citizen Enforcer, yes, I'm punching them in the mouth. I don't care if they have a gun. Making sure my wife is taken care of is priority #1. If he shoots, I'll be dead and won't have another care in this world. My wife will become a wealthy woman. So... I win either way.
Read both articles and watched the video.
No racial slurs. @GT Premi is crying again for no reason.
Just because the articles both say " White man shot a black man in self defense" does not mean it was racially motivated.
Personally, if I see people parking like a complete asshole, or blocking a spot that is used for either emergencies or something else, I will say something, with or without my gun. No, it is not because I am "billy badass internetz guy" it is simply because I say what is right. It is also how you go about it and granted, the person involved had a gun.
However much I don't agree with taking a life over something so minuscule, no matter if Drejka was looking for a fight, or, kind of keeping an eye on his community despite not being law enforcement, that was a HARD shove from a much bigger guy.
Also, if ANYONE actually notices in the video -Mcglochton comes storming out of the store and immediately goes right after Drejka and pushes him damn hard, and once the guy is on the ground, he approaches him even more. It is only until Drejka drew his weapon that he backed up.
One can only speculate what could and would have happened, but, I see it as Mclochton was going to beat the crap out of Drejka, most likely because he was being a macho man protecting his woman.
All of this coould have been avoided if they either did not park in a spot to avoid any type of problem (I kind of think that they too were looking for problems by doing so and knowing what they are doing is illegal and wrong) and it also could have been avoided if Mclochton didn't come out and initiate the confrontation in such an aggressive manner that became physical. I am confident if Mclochton walked up and told the guy sorry and drove away, everyone would be going about their lives.
Two wrongs do not make a right.
Billy badass. AF.
Sike!
You are about as hard and an avocado.
Hes got you (and the rest of us) on ignore brah.
So, in other words, you're going to do all the mental gymnastics possible to make the murderer look innocent of a situation that HE INSTIGATED IN THE FIRST PLACE. Saying the victim "shouldn't have parked in the handicap spot" is beyond disingenuous. Classic blame-the-victim tactic. I guess women who get raped shouldn't have went to the place where it happened or worn what they were wearing. I mean, if she didn't go there and/or dress in a way that provoked the rapist... It's not the rapist's fault he couldn't control his impulses brought on by what a woman wears. He was providing a community service by punishing women who don't dress the way moral "laws" say they should. If she had dressed more modestly, she wouldn't have been raped. Right?
I didn't say it was racially motivated, did I?! I said the murderer was using racial slurs. Stop being lazy and go read the beginnings of this thread where other articles were posted that the wife said the murderer was yelling racial slurs at her. And why is it that you people somehow expect black people to just say "yassa massa" and start backing down when y'all want to act the fool??? FOH with that mess. Yeah, the victim is dead, but the murderer is also going to prison because he wanted to be Billy Badass. Now he'll be getting all the ass kickings he deserves, and he won't have a gun to turn to. Poetic justice.
If somebody comes in my face trying to be Citizen Enforcer, yes, I'm punching them in the mouth. I don't care if they have a gun. Making sure my wife is taken care of is priority #1. If he shoots, I'll be dead and won't have another care in this world. My wife will become a wealthy woman. So... I win either way.
If he shoots, I'll be dead and won't have another care in this world. My wife will become a wealthy woman. So... I win either way.
Well, if you want to come at me with racial slurs, I won’t continue this conversation.
No one here made it racial until you did with calling me “ you people”
Stop playing the victim.
Just for the record, if someone comes up and simply says “hey, why are you parked in the handicapped spot or blocking a driveway or something” you’re going to just punch them
In the mouth? Who is billy badass now?
Have fun continuing to call people here racists yet ignoring you’re one too. Pot meet kettle.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
There it is! The classic "stop playing the victim" deflection tactic! Comes out literally every time. Please explain how I'm "playing the victim." To your question; it's irrelevant because I wouldn't park in a handicap spot unless I had a placard, and I wouldn't block a driveway unless I was remaining with my car. If some schmuck comes getting in my or my wife's face all belligerent, yes, he's asking for a face full of fist; especially if he has no legal interest in said driveway.
Books, I think this unfolded the way it did because each bully thought he had a decisive advantage. So, without the gun, I don't think shooter would have behaved as he did. On the other hand, if shootee didn't believe he had a decisive physical advantage , I think his approach to the matter might have been different as well.
Why would he not have a right to be in an establishment open to the public? Had he been PNG'd ?But the real question is was the shooter really ever in place defined as "anywhere he has a right to be."...?
Considering his history, prior threats and actions..I say no. And that is the seed of it from the beginning.