This guy makes some good points and raises lotsa questions.......maybe you won't agree with it all but a LOT of it makes sense!!
This guy makes some good points and raises lotsa questions.......maybe you won't agree with it all but a LOT of it makes sense!!
When I grow up I want to be one of those people who believes in fake things with zero evidence and doesn’t believe in real things with tons of evidence.
Should bring back the old airplane on a conveyor belt while we're at itBest part of this thread was 70+ year old Buzz punching that man in the face lmaooooooooooooooo
The rest of it is the usual SVTP conspiracy.
Should bring back the old airplane on a conveyor belt while we're at it
Erm.
He is rambling obviously.
I don't think he is saying we didn't go to the moon. To me it sounds like he is answering the question by stating that they (astronauts) didn't ask that same question when they had the chance.
Honestly it does sound like his mind is starting to give up on him.So Joe Biden and Buzz Aldrin walk into a bar... "what we come in here for again?"
No ground based telescope is strong enough to see it. The Hubble is not even powerful enough to see that detail. The LRO however has somewhat clear images of the Apollo landing sites, taken in 2009.So if its as simple as seeing the landing site and items left behind through a telescope, whats the issue?
Sent from my SM-G986U using the svtperformance.com mobile app
Honestly it does sound like his mind is starting to give up on him.
Hubble is a deep field telescope, basically far sighted, especially with the modifications we had to put in the optics (think glasses) because they ground the main mirror wrong. Sites on earth or the moon are just too close, it simply can't focus. Like using a telescope when a magnifying glass works much better.No ground based telescope is strong enough to see it. The Hubble is not even powerful enough to see that detail. The LRO however has somewhat clear images of the Apollo landing sites, taken in 2009.
But CoosawJack couldn't see it with his handheld camera so... fake
Yea, I know close objects are not Hubble's intent but it can and has taken photos of the moon and even still the pixel density is not strong enough to see detail less than 30feet across. My only point is that Jack's camera is not going to see anything. It wouldn't even see an entire city.Hubble is a deep field telescope, basically far sighted, especially with the modifications we had to put in the optics (think glasses) because they ground the main mirror wrong. Sites on earth or the moon are just too close, it simply can't focus. Like using a telescope when a magnifying glass works much better.
And more than likely the flags are probably white, as solar radiation has bleached them. So it probably looks like the French landed there. But the equipment that was painted probably still shows old glory.
Sent from my Note9 using Tapatalk
probably why the filthy masked commies are losingYou can tell that is Trump's Space Force (NOT wearing masks)