Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Cobra Forums
SVT Shelby GT500
2.8 KB vs 2.9 Whipple
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Blaine" data-source="post: 8369153" data-attributes="member: 36571"><p>I've yet to see a dyno graph showing KB with less parasitic loss. I've looked at alot of dynos and compared them. So far its showing the 2.9 Whipple with a bit more Power at the same boost with similiar mods. :shrug: Its a 2.9L vs a 2.8L supercharger.. those two are in the same ballpark and its pretty much personal preference.</p><p></p><p>If your concluding the 3.4 whipple makes less power than a 2.8L KB...:dw: Those dyno comparisons I have seen between the two are not even in the same ballpark. 3.4 Whipple just buries the KB. Whipple 3.4 needs about 18lbs of boost to hit 750 rwhp. Kenne Bell needs well over 22lbs of boost with Race Fuel to even come close to 750 rwhp.:read: 3.4 Whipple doesn't even need race fuel for the 800 rwhp mark. Remember the newer 3.4 Whipples use the new rotors... maybe more efficient than the older style 3.4? :shrug:</p><p></p><p><img src="http://www.kennebell.net/superchargers/ford/Shelby/DynoTestSummary.gif" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></p><p></p><p>Unless there are some Top Secret Dyno sheets I have never seen with Kenne Bells superchargers? Post them. I'd love to see more.<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite7" alt=":p" title="Stick Out Tongue :p" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":p" />op:</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Blaine, post: 8369153, member: 36571"] I've yet to see a dyno graph showing KB with less parasitic loss. I've looked at alot of dynos and compared them. So far its showing the 2.9 Whipple with a bit more Power at the same boost with similiar mods. :shrug: Its a 2.9L vs a 2.8L supercharger.. those two are in the same ballpark and its pretty much personal preference. If your concluding the 3.4 whipple makes less power than a 2.8L KB...:dw: Those dyno comparisons I have seen between the two are not even in the same ballpark. 3.4 Whipple just buries the KB. Whipple 3.4 needs about 18lbs of boost to hit 750 rwhp. Kenne Bell needs well over 22lbs of boost with Race Fuel to even come close to 750 rwhp.:read: 3.4 Whipple doesn't even need race fuel for the 800 rwhp mark. Remember the newer 3.4 Whipples use the new rotors... maybe more efficient than the older style 3.4? :shrug: [IMG]http://www.kennebell.net/superchargers/ford/Shelby/DynoTestSummary.gif[/IMG] Unless there are some Top Secret Dyno sheets I have never seen with Kenne Bells superchargers? Post them. I'd love to see more.:pop: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Cobra Forums
SVT Shelby GT500
2.8 KB vs 2.9 Whipple
Top