Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Time Slip Bar
2008 vette dynos 400 RWHP STOCK no break in
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="FEARSNO1" data-source="post: 5311524" data-attributes="member: 9770"><p>that is not all that great,good maybe but not great, that car is rated at 436 at the crank add 15% to 395(actual dyno number) for drivetrain loss and you come up with 454,18 hp big deal.. now take my gt500 for instance that dynoed 481 stock and add 15% and you get 553. that is 53hp over rated hp at the crank, THAT IS GREAT!!!!!</p><p></p><p>the biggest the advantage the vette has is the weight, not the motor</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="FEARSNO1, post: 5311524, member: 9770"] that is not all that great,good maybe but not great, that car is rated at 436 at the crank add 15% to 395(actual dyno number) for drivetrain loss and you come up with 454,18 hp big deal.. now take my gt500 for instance that dynoed 481 stock and add 15% and you get 553. that is 53hp over rated hp at the crank, THAT IS GREAT!!!!! the biggest the advantage the vette has is the weight, not the motor [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Time Slip Bar
2008 vette dynos 400 RWHP STOCK no break in
Top