Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Kill Drive-Thru
2012 300C vs 03 Mach 1
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="O3dsg" data-source="post: 12727463" data-attributes="member: 39547"><p>Let’s look at some facts the 2012 Hemi Eagle 5.7 makes 363Hp and 394Tq so this equates to.</p><p></p><p>63.68Hp per liter</p><p>69.12Tq per liter</p><p></p><p>Here we have Ford's crappy 10 year old Mach 1 Dohc 4.6l motor Rated at 305Hp and 320Tq which equals.</p><p></p><p>66.30Hp per liter</p><p>69.56Tq per liter</p><p></p><p>So it looks to me Fords 10 year old technology is still ahead of Mopar.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="O3dsg, post: 12727463, member: 39547"] Let’s look at some facts the 2012 Hemi Eagle 5.7 makes 363Hp and 394Tq so this equates to. 63.68Hp per liter 69.12Tq per liter Here we have Ford's crappy 10 year old Mach 1 Dohc 4.6l motor Rated at 305Hp and 320Tq which equals. 66.30Hp per liter 69.56Tq per liter So it looks to me Fords 10 year old technology is still ahead of Mopar. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Kill Drive-Thru
2012 300C vs 03 Mach 1
Top