Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Kill Drive-Thru
2012 300C vs 03 Mach 1
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="da5deuce" data-source="post: 12732289" data-attributes="member: 106520"><p>As far as price to"build" I'll agree the cost is a bit much compared to an LS1 but power potential N/A is definitely there. Prime example there's a guy on this site who went 11.5X @ 12x.X with a STOCK LONG BLOCK, a STOCK LONGBLOCK. So when anyone says a 4V doesn't have N/A potential they are wrong. Granted he has ALOT of weight reduction and carbd the motor but still its a stock 4V.</p><p></p><p>The Mercedes CL63 is a 6.3L 4V engine which goes to prove the OHC design in my opinion is better than a pushrod because of the power it makes, yes it cost a bitch load to build compared to the LS series but it would make better numbers to the crank with the same compression ratio. To make it more interesting I want to see the raptor engine made into a 4V and see what kinda numbers it would make because I am positive it would make LS7 numbers if not more to the crank.</p><p></p><p>Other than cost to build the DOHC motor I'll always like it better than a pushrod</p><p></p><p>Sent from straight outta Compton a Yung brotha named 5DEUCE writin on Tapatalk sippin lemon juice</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="da5deuce, post: 12732289, member: 106520"] As far as price to"build" I'll agree the cost is a bit much compared to an LS1 but power potential N/A is definitely there. Prime example there's a guy on this site who went 11.5X @ 12x.X with a STOCK LONG BLOCK, a STOCK LONGBLOCK. So when anyone says a 4V doesn't have N/A potential they are wrong. Granted he has ALOT of weight reduction and carbd the motor but still its a stock 4V. The Mercedes CL63 is a 6.3L 4V engine which goes to prove the OHC design in my opinion is better than a pushrod because of the power it makes, yes it cost a bitch load to build compared to the LS series but it would make better numbers to the crank with the same compression ratio. To make it more interesting I want to see the raptor engine made into a 4V and see what kinda numbers it would make because I am positive it would make LS7 numbers if not more to the crank. Other than cost to build the DOHC motor I'll always like it better than a pushrod Sent from straight outta Compton a Yung brotha named 5DEUCE writin on Tapatalk sippin lemon juice [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Kill Drive-Thru
2012 300C vs 03 Mach 1
Top