Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Side Pub
2018+ mustang, thoughts on options?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dusten" data-source="post: 15928484" data-attributes="member: 38972"><p>A) thats why im looking used.</p><p></p><p>B) define working man? Im just a lowly enlisted man and can afford one with relative ease.</p><p></p><p>A base mustang gt fastback in 1968 was roughly 45% of the average families annual income</p><p></p><p>A base gt now costs 59% of the median household income. </p><p></p><p>Now with that 14% rise how much extra does that car have?</p><p></p><p>The american consumer is demanding more and more luxury. More andy more safety. </p><p></p><p>Along with that the rise in cost comes partly due to the fact the mustang doesnt share a platform. The mustang originally shared its chassis with the falcon, and later the fairmont. This keeps cost down.</p><p></p><p>And lastly the mustang wasn't designed for the working man. It was marketed at women.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dusten, post: 15928484, member: 38972"] A) thats why im looking used. B) define working man? Im just a lowly enlisted man and can afford one with relative ease. A base mustang gt fastback in 1968 was roughly 45% of the average families annual income A base gt now costs 59% of the median household income. Now with that 14% rise how much extra does that car have? The american consumer is demanding more and more luxury. More andy more safety. Along with that the rise in cost comes partly due to the fact the mustang doesnt share a platform. The mustang originally shared its chassis with the falcon, and later the fairmont. This keeps cost down. And lastly the mustang wasn't designed for the working man. It was marketed at women. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Side Pub
2018+ mustang, thoughts on options?
Top