Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Cobra Forums
2020+ Shelby GT500 Mustang
2020 -vs 2014 GT500
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="gimmie11s" data-source="post: 16271178" data-attributes="member: 17953"><p>In the interest of being brief I’d say</p><p></p><p>False</p><p>False</p><p>Possibly </p><p></p><p>To your 3 points above. </p><p></p><p>1. Heads are certainly NOT better. Matter of fact the main reason Fords motor finally became competitive after the ass kicking it was taking from the LS guys is the COYOTE HEADS introduced in 2011. They are the reason Ford finally broke 400 hp N/A. Coyote heads flow about 4% more than trinity heads in stock form—in 2011. The 2018+ coyote heads are a BIG step up from trinity.</p><p></p><p>Coyote also introduced TiVCT. A HUGE advantage over the old modular platform.</p><p></p><p>2. 760>662. Pretty easy to see why you’re wrong there.</p><p></p><p>3. “Potential” is a pretty wide ranging idea. At the 1500hp level and below, the coyote is the OBVIOUS choice not only for power output and durability, but also cost.</p><p></p><p>Max effort 2000+ horsepower? Maybe what’s tried and true is best and hand the nod to old modular technology.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Sent from my iPhone using the <a href="http://r.tapatalk.com/byo?rid=92568" target="_blank">svtperformance.com mobile app</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="gimmie11s, post: 16271178, member: 17953"] In the interest of being brief I’d say False False Possibly To your 3 points above. 1. Heads are certainly NOT better. Matter of fact the main reason Fords motor finally became competitive after the ass kicking it was taking from the LS guys is the COYOTE HEADS introduced in 2011. They are the reason Ford finally broke 400 hp N/A. Coyote heads flow about 4% more than trinity heads in stock form—in 2011. The 2018+ coyote heads are a BIG step up from trinity. Coyote also introduced TiVCT. A HUGE advantage over the old modular platform. 2. 760>662. Pretty easy to see why you’re wrong there. 3. “Potential” is a pretty wide ranging idea. At the 1500hp level and below, the coyote is the OBVIOUS choice not only for power output and durability, but also cost. Max effort 2000+ horsepower? Maybe what’s tried and true is best and hand the nod to old modular technology. Sent from my iPhone using the [url=http://r.tapatalk.com/byo?rid=92568]svtperformance.com mobile app[/url] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Cobra Forums
2020+ Shelby GT500 Mustang
2020 -vs 2014 GT500
Top