Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Cobra Forums
2020+ Shelby GT500 Mustang
2020 -vs 2014 GT500
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tt335ci03cobra" data-source="post: 16271367" data-attributes="member: 68944"><p>You are a stage 10 dumb ****er asking for a back hand to the head.</p><p></p><p>DJ (I don’t know this person you speak of) is using SAE 1349 or 607. The corrections vary on what temp and humidity and whether gross, net, etc. You have no clue what you’re on about.</p><p></p><p>There is no low speed velocity in a stage 3 (+) ported gt500 head.</p><p></p><p>Throw my head on a gt500 with stock blower et al. Only change the heads. Reinstall the stock cams, air inlet, filter and all. Just throw my heads in. Set the valve train accordingly to accommodate the stock cam, but larger valve openings and tension.</p><p></p><p>Guaranteed it drops 150-200wtq at 2500rpm, and loses 4-5psi with the same pulley combo, and picks up 150whp at 7000rpm making tops 11psi.</p><p></p><p>You clearly don’t even understand how cylinder heads work, because you said earlier and now that a ported head is needed and that it needs a 2.65 TVS.</p><p></p><p>Wrong. Just the ****ing ported head would get it to 760 crank hp with the damn 2.3L but it would lose tons of low end torque. If you repullied the tvs to 15psi, with the ported head, you’d have more than enough air flow to make 760 crank hp from a trinity. That would be something near 370cfm at 15psix2.3L</p><p></p><p>You have no clue what you are going on about.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tt335ci03cobra, post: 16271367, member: 68944"] You are a stage 10 dumb ****er asking for a back hand to the head. DJ (I don’t know this person you speak of) is using SAE 1349 or 607. The corrections vary on what temp and humidity and whether gross, net, etc. You have no clue what you’re on about. There is no low speed velocity in a stage 3 (+) ported gt500 head. Throw my head on a gt500 with stock blower et al. Only change the heads. Reinstall the stock cams, air inlet, filter and all. Just throw my heads in. Set the valve train accordingly to accommodate the stock cam, but larger valve openings and tension. Guaranteed it drops 150-200wtq at 2500rpm, and loses 4-5psi with the same pulley combo, and picks up 150whp at 7000rpm making tops 11psi. You clearly don’t even understand how cylinder heads work, because you said earlier and now that a ported head is needed and that it needs a 2.65 TVS. Wrong. Just the ****ing ported head would get it to 760 crank hp with the damn 2.3L but it would lose tons of low end torque. If you repullied the tvs to 15psi, with the ported head, you’d have more than enough air flow to make 760 crank hp from a trinity. That would be something near 370cfm at 15psix2.3L You have no clue what you are going on about. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Cobra Forums
2020+ Shelby GT500 Mustang
2020 -vs 2014 GT500
Top