Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Cobra Forums
2020+ Shelby GT500 Mustang
2020 -vs 2014 GT500
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="biminiLX" data-source="post: 16271395" data-attributes="member: 7795"><p>Very interesting discussion, 5.8 vs 5.2, as both are the top dogs of the Modular and Coyote platforms.</p><p>Not really technical here, but yes, you can consider the Coyote as an extension of the Modular platform.</p><p>The head and valvetrain was packaged much more efficiently. The heads flow better stock and the stock cams can be pretty aggressive due to VCT.</p><p>So, for stock engines and response to basic mods or even boost from the stock parts, Coyote hands down.</p><p>When you talk full effort race applications, the winner is not cut and dry. See John Milvovetz.</p><p>The max effort heads are very similar in flow with the GT/GT500 heads at max port flowing great and with large volume runners, great for boost.</p><p>VCT not a factor in race application.</p><p>Block strength to Modular at this time.</p><p>So, not a simple debate.</p><p>But yes, I expect the new Predator 5.2 to have more potential than the Trinity 5.8</p><p>-J</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="biminiLX, post: 16271395, member: 7795"] Very interesting discussion, 5.8 vs 5.2, as both are the top dogs of the Modular and Coyote platforms. Not really technical here, but yes, you can consider the Coyote as an extension of the Modular platform. The head and valvetrain was packaged much more efficiently. The heads flow better stock and the stock cams can be pretty aggressive due to VCT. So, for stock engines and response to basic mods or even boost from the stock parts, Coyote hands down. When you talk full effort race applications, the winner is not cut and dry. See John Milvovetz. The max effort heads are very similar in flow with the GT/GT500 heads at max port flowing great and with large volume runners, great for boost. VCT not a factor in race application. Block strength to Modular at this time. So, not a simple debate. But yes, I expect the new Predator 5.2 to have more potential than the Trinity 5.8 -J [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Cobra Forums
2020+ Shelby GT500 Mustang
2020 -vs 2014 GT500
Top