A/F Question

Shaun@AED

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2005
Messages
2,253
Location
CA
Yes, Measured AF is measured lambda.
Lambse is commanded lambda.

The difference between these 2 results in Short and Long term fuel trimming.
 

mhyjek

Active Member
Established Member
Joined
Jul 30, 2012
Messages
1,037
Location
NJ
For Reference Ford Racing Procals command .86 lambda at WOT.

.85 Lambda commanded @ 14.64 = 12.44:1 air fuel
.85 Lambda commanded @ 14.08 = 11.97 (Track pack car would read this on the dash)

Same actual air to fuel ratio (lambda), different programming. This is why we use lambda.



Some do run more fuel on the #8, but I do not. We solved the lean condition differently, at the source.

Even more of a reason to have you tune the car!
Can't wait to see what you do with new 2.3 turbo mustang; I'm sure it will be great!
Happy New Year!
 

kcsvt94l

1D 10 T Error
Established Member
Joined
Feb 14, 2007
Messages
1,755
Location
Kansas City, MO
Even more of a reason to have you tune the car!
Can't wait to see what you do with new 2.3 turbo mustang; I'm sure it will be great!
Happy New Year!


Shaun is a genius no doubt. I'm going to be calling him soon in fact as I'm going to the Cobra Jet/E85 setup. :beer:
 

onspeed

New Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2012
Messages
4
Location
Austin
Dyno readings are not accurate enough IMO. They are not programmed the same as the Factory ECU.

Dyno widebands 1.0 Lambda = 14.64:1
Factory Ford Programming 1.0 Lambda = 14.08:1

This means a dyno will always read leaner than the Ford ECU. Couple that with cats and taking measurements at the tail pipe and you could be WAY off on your dyno readings. Especially if the dyno unit is not an ECM wideband.

I tune on Lambda. .83 to .84 lambda commanded on NA Coyotes and into the .7's for boost.

Just to clarify, Ford is commanding ~14.1 AFR as Lamda = 1 for 100% gasoline? So the factory tune is a tad on the rich side?

Also, since they're using WBO2s, there shouldn't be a need for an external WBO2 sensor for taking afr measurements, yes?
 

Shaun@AED

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2005
Messages
2,253
Location
CA
Just to clarify, Ford is commanding ~14.1 AFR as Lamda = 1 for 100% gasoline? So the factory tune is a tad on the rich side?

Also, since they're using WBO2s, there shouldn't be a need for an external WBO2 sensor for taking afr measurements, yes?

Yessir
 

DIB5.0

New Member
Established Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2010
Messages
915
Location
USA
A lot of tuners were claiming 30hp gain with tune when they first came out because of high afr and high timing and then messing with the knock sensors. Now most know not to go over .85 lambda and timing no higher than 27* on 93. i think most are at .83 with timing set at 24*.
 

spdracr0

New Member
Established Member
Joined
May 28, 2011
Messages
283
Location
SC
So that explains why mine had yet to go nuclear. Not as lean as I thought it was. Well almost.
 

Users who are viewing this thread



Top