Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Cobra Forums
SVT Shelby GT500
Awesome Pics of "New 05 Mustang Concept"Coupe Version
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ntechnic" data-source="post: 254425" data-attributes="member: 6235"><p>Man, am I glad I got the '03. I owned a '65 a '68 and a '69. Also of course one '89 (didn't like it and sold it) and my '95 GT convertible. When the SN95 came out, I went "Wow! Perfect, got to have it!" </p><p></p><p>This is too retro for me. Where did creativity go these days? The first Fox body looked nothing like any Mustang before it, and was obviously a huge hit. The SN95 had only the vaguest of styling hints from the first gen Mustang, and still stood on a look all of its own. This is too much of a strain to look retro. My experience with retro is that it gets old quickly, once the novelty wears off.</p><p></p><p>My wife and I have bought seven new Fords or Lincolns in the last 13 years. And both of us had the same “Eww!” reaction to these photos. The convertible is especially bad, it just looks like a slight skin change and rebadge of the new T-bird. It’s like STAMP, it’s a boring Lincoln LS (don’t even get me started on this subject, suffice it to say it was so bad it drove us to buy a Cadillac). STAMP it’s a T-bird. STAMP it’s a Mustang.</p><p></p><p>Shame too, the chassis platform holds so much promise.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ntechnic, post: 254425, member: 6235"] Man, am I glad I got the '03. I owned a '65 a '68 and a '69. Also of course one '89 (didn't like it and sold it) and my '95 GT convertible. When the SN95 came out, I went "Wow! Perfect, got to have it!" This is too retro for me. Where did creativity go these days? The first Fox body looked nothing like any Mustang before it, and was obviously a huge hit. The SN95 had only the vaguest of styling hints from the first gen Mustang, and still stood on a look all of its own. This is too much of a strain to look retro. My experience with retro is that it gets old quickly, once the novelty wears off. My wife and I have bought seven new Fords or Lincolns in the last 13 years. And both of us had the same “Eww!” reaction to these photos. The convertible is especially bad, it just looks like a slight skin change and rebadge of the new T-bird. It’s like STAMP, it’s a boring Lincoln LS (don’t even get me started on this subject, suffice it to say it was so bad it drove us to buy a Cadillac). STAMP it’s a T-bird. STAMP it’s a Mustang. Shame too, the chassis platform holds so much promise. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Cobra Forums
SVT Shelby GT500
Awesome Pics of "New 05 Mustang Concept"Coupe Version
Top