http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...take_road_test
Looks like then went 13.2 @ 109mph in a base GT with brembos and rear gear option, although it doesn't specify if it was 3.55's or 3.73's.
The part I didn't like was this:
Hopefully this is a rare problem as gas eats paint.
Looks like then went 13.2 @ 109mph in a base GT with brembos and rear gear option, although it doesn't specify if it was 3.55's or 3.73's.
The part I didn't like was this:
Car and Driver said:What’s not better is the capless fuel port Ford adopted last year. The idea of getting rid of a fussy, hard-to-turn cap is great—except that we always seem to spill fuel on the car and on our shoes. And after some hard cornering on a full tank, we noticed signs of weeping down the Mustang’s quarter panel where dust had collected in the dampness. Last year Ford told us there was a problem with early filler necks and that it had been fixed. What do they have to tell us now?
Hopefully this is a rare problem as gas eats paint.