Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Other Fast Ford Vehicles
Taurus SHO
Gen I, II, and III Taurus SHO
considering a Gen 2 SHO
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="The BigSHO" data-source="post: 165345" data-attributes="member: 3862"><p>Agreed... The ATX's are not as bad as people say they are. I would take a low mileage 94/95 ATX no problem. Once you start getting in to the ATX world, however, tons more possibilities exist. That being the case and changing subjects, I'd probably get a GTP. I'm sure I'll get flamed now<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /> </p><p></p><p>The 155MPH 2004 GTP G Force with 280HP/280TQ, racing automatic, and .85G skidpad should be a HELL of a car. I test drove a 2000 GTP awhile back. They BARK off the line. It would beat my SHO and SVT off the line. My son's modified 2000 CSVT would beat it off the line. All of our cars would beat this stock GTP in high end. The GTP got easily winded at highway speeds even shifting the auto manually. The GTP was stock. Mash the gas in drive and the tranny gives up too easily and shifts lazily at ~4K. Nothing a shift kit in the auto wouldn't fix. The handling is subpar compared to a 26mm rear sway SHO or definitely a CSVT. Pontiac calls it wide track - more like wallow track:uh oh: </p><p></p><p>It sure looks like Pontiac fixes all the GTP problems in 2004.:thumbsup:</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="The BigSHO, post: 165345, member: 3862"] Agreed... The ATX's are not as bad as people say they are. I would take a low mileage 94/95 ATX no problem. Once you start getting in to the ATX world, however, tons more possibilities exist. That being the case and changing subjects, I'd probably get a GTP. I'm sure I'll get flamed now:) The 155MPH 2004 GTP G Force with 280HP/280TQ, racing automatic, and .85G skidpad should be a HELL of a car. I test drove a 2000 GTP awhile back. They BARK off the line. It would beat my SHO and SVT off the line. My son's modified 2000 CSVT would beat it off the line. All of our cars would beat this stock GTP in high end. The GTP got easily winded at highway speeds even shifting the auto manually. The GTP was stock. Mash the gas in drive and the tranny gives up too easily and shifts lazily at ~4K. Nothing a shift kit in the auto wouldn't fix. The handling is subpar compared to a 26mm rear sway SHO or definitely a CSVT. Pontiac calls it wide track - more like wallow track:uh oh: It sure looks like Pontiac fixes all the GTP problems in 2004.:thumbsup: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Other Fast Ford Vehicles
Taurus SHO
Gen I, II, and III Taurus SHO
considering a Gen 2 SHO
Top