Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Side Pub
Engineers that use MIL specs or standards step inside
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Spoolx" data-source="post: 15304207" data-attributes="member: 106701"><p>So I design products for a company and we routinely use mil specs to identify process parameters for our products. For example we may say polish per mil spec-xxx.xx., or anodize per mil spec-xxx.xx</p><p></p><p>Recently, I released a drawing that said process per mil-spec-xxx.xxx and below it I identified a parameter that falls outside the mil spec.</p><p></p><p>More specifically I said process per mil-spec -xxx.xx, and apply a coating thickness of .0004-.0008. However, the mil spec recommends a minimum of .0005.</p><p></p><p>We use the thickness primarily to dictate a color we want</p><p> So we had to use that range, additionally it was recommended by the coating business who applies this coat in per the mil spec all day every day. I originally thought it was no problem but I am starting to second guess myself. The mil-spec provides tons of information, and we deviate from one small portion of it to fit our needs. We aren't military.</p><p></p><p></p><p>What is everyone's take on it?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Spoolx, post: 15304207, member: 106701"] So I design products for a company and we routinely use mil specs to identify process parameters for our products. For example we may say polish per mil spec-xxx.xx., or anodize per mil spec-xxx.xx Recently, I released a drawing that said process per mil-spec-xxx.xxx and below it I identified a parameter that falls outside the mil spec. More specifically I said process per mil-spec -xxx.xx, and apply a coating thickness of .0004-.0008. However, the mil spec recommends a minimum of .0005. We use the thickness primarily to dictate a color we want So we had to use that range, additionally it was recommended by the coating business who applies this coat in per the mil spec all day every day. I originally thought it was no problem but I am starting to second guess myself. The mil-spec provides tons of information, and we deviate from one small portion of it to fit our needs. We aren't military. What is everyone's take on it? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Side Pub
Engineers that use MIL specs or standards step inside
Top