SID297 said:It's not just the name that's trademarked, it's the context with which that name is used. I can't leagally produce a car and call it a Mustang, but I can leagally produce a beer and call it a Mustang
That is EXACTLY what I was going to say.
As a graphic designer, I always have to be careful with designs. It is VERY easy to tread on copyright/trademark laws if you aren't careful.
Guess what? If you snatch a pic off the internet, and use it in your sig, unless you have permission to use that pic, you have violated copyright law. Now, if someone sued you, they have to show DAMAGE was done to them by the use, or that you profited by use of the pic.
Now, take that same picture, modify it (make it greyscale, run a few filters on it, basically make the pic unrecognizable). You have made that picture your own artwork. How much should you change the artwork? Well, there are various percentages tossed out there, from 60-80%. Basically, if it passes the man on the street test (a number of random people on the street, show original pic and your artwork, and ask if they are the same picture. Majority needs to say "no" and you are OK)
Anyhow, I digress.
Is Ford within their rights to go after people with the word "mustang" in their company name, and selling stuff in the car market? Yes, they are. But is it in their best interest to be doing it so aggressively? I don't believe so.
A few years ago, www.thedieselstop.com was known as www.powerstrokediesel.com (I believe). Guess why they changed their name...