FS/FT 535 HP 1998 Mustang GT 12k!

[sc98cbra]

delete

 

[corysmach1]

Did it dyno 525rwhp? If so thats good for deep 11's at 125 easy

 

[tankerman1981]

wow..love that color..good luck with the sale

 

[sc98cbra]

ttt

 

[sc98cbra]

Ttt $11,750... Would like gone!

 

[sc98cbra]

TTT.

Sitting in Pro-Dyno to get sheets to prove power output and A/F ratio..

Car ran 11.43 last time at darlington..


Car now sports 18" Chrome fr500s... Looks sexy

 

[sc98cbra]

Ttt.

 

[sc98cbra]

ttt.... new pics

 

[69fb]

why the low trap mph? Seems more like upper 300's for a 112-114 trap.

 

[sc98cbra]

delete

 

[69fb]

I don't know what you're comparing my cars' time slips to,
.

I"m comparing it to physics and mathematics.......


It's possible the mph at the track you visit is not accurate...ie...WAY off




Anyway....it's a really sharp car and it looks like you've put a lot of time and money into it....good luck with the sale.

 

[sc98cbra]

delete

 

[69fb]

I'm thoroughly disappointed by your lack of reading skills and comprehension. (Although I am not surprised.)


When/where did I ever compare your ET's to hp?


MPH (trap speed) is a direct function of vehicle weight and horsepower (with a couple other factors on a much smaller scale).

I have been down the 1320' plenty of times, but it has nothing to do with math.

What's funny and ironic is the information you posted to "prove your point" only further confirmed mine. To reiterate for you: mph is a function of hp and vehicle weight.

Just so you know: 525rwhp in a 3700# car will trap higher than 114.





Didn't mean to hijack your thread....just questioned the hp claim vs the trap speed you posted.

 

[sc98cbra]

edit..

Im going to start a new thread.

Once again. Stay out of my post. Click my name, and hit "Send private message to sc98cbra" if you wish for me to further prove you wrong.