got my 2.9 e-85 tuned

[jimc04]

240278[/ATTACH]"]

this is on a mustang dyno 3.2 upper only with a glenns performance return setup i dont know if this power is what to expect???

 

[98 Saleen Cobra]

Damn!! Why'd it stop the pull!! that bitch was still climbing!!! Awesome numbers man!

 

[jimc04]

well the reason for stopping the pull is the tuner said it made 25 more hp going from 6500 to 6800 do i want to go to 7000 rpm i said no torque seems low??

 

[98 Saleen Cobra]

Seems about right but I would have pulled it hard for sure lol.. The tq on the 2.9's seem to be lower.. Maybe a 2-4# lower will bring it up??

 

[jimc04]

i was to chicken lol so a mustang dyno compared to a dyno jet would be around 30hp?

 

[98 Saleen Cobra]

No probably a lot more.. It depends on the load and how he has it setup but typically MD read 10-15& lower than dynojets.. You're probably sitting close to 700rwhp on a dynojet..

 

[BADASS03SVT]

only way to see Dynojet numbers is to put it on a DJ. a MD has way too many variables to put a "percentage" on it.

I would have pulled till it started to fall off to see where my PEAK HP was

 

[jimc04]

the dyno is just set up for mustangs thats all this shop works on. so i would hope im good. also the plugs my tuner said to use are ngk 7317 r5724-8 anybody know anything about these plugs? gapped at .028 oh how does it run well 3rd gear im spinning sidesways on 315/35/17 hoosiers drag radials 25psi its fun lol

 

[VenomSVT03]

Seems about right but I would have pulled it hard for sure lol.. The tq on the 2.9's seem to be lower.. Maybe a 2-4# lower will bring it up??

my 2.9 put out 700tq, i dont think thats low. maybe its his setup

 

[blowngt]

my 2.9 put out 700tq, i dont think thats low. maybe its his setup

Sounds low to me.........oke:

 

[VenomSVT03]

Sounds low to me.........oke:

 

[jimc04]

my motor is stock expect for the whipple and fuel system. what would cause the torque too be low? like i said its a 3.2 upper only.

 

[98 Saleen Cobra]

my 2.9 put out 700tq, i dont think thats low. maybe its his setup

Your car also has more compression as well.. That probably helps.. Or your car is a freak.. one of the two ahahaah.

 

[50 Deep]

My car made 706/611 on a mix of 91 octane and race gas. The torque numbers are usually a lot lower than the peak power on the 2.9's. For the guy making 730/700 your results are not the norm on most typical 2.9 cars i have seen on here and other sites.

Good numbers though OP. my 91 octane tune is a little over 650rwhp but i have ported heads and cams. With your E85 tune i would expect you to be around that much with a stock block.

 

[VenomSVT03]

btw this is with stock heads, stock cams and stock manifolds at only 20* of timing

 

[04GTMustang]

More details on your car venom?

 

[VenomSVT03]

More details on your car venom?

built motor 9.7:1 compression, whipple 2.9, e85

 

[jimc04]

my tuner told me i had about 20 more hp left in it. i didnt drive the car much after i got it back lost the alternator 48,000 miles later.

 

[evil04svtcobra]

power level does seem low for that much boost.

 

[gabe1530]

a 3.2 upper should net you 18lbs on the hit and then climb to 20/21lbs at peak. all depending on what mods you have.

on e85 with stock compression you could ditch that 3.2 upper and run as low as a 2.9 upper. there is a lot of potential left with more boost on the corn as i made similar numbers on torco. also remember these bigger blowers dont make as much torque at lower boost levels.