Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Donut Shop
Grounds for Order of Dismissal?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TDUB003" data-source="post: 9678917" data-attributes="member: 72580"><p>I am not a lawyer nor do I claim to be and obviously don't know everything about the law, which is why I posted here for advice. I was actually worried about the fact that my main source of evidence was e-mail which is why I looked up the actual lawsuit in which the limit was stipulated. This post caused me to look up best evidence and if I understand it correctly and the definition is correct it states that modern evidentiary rules usually permit the use of mechanical, electronic, or other similar copy instead of the original. If I need to file an order of information in order to get an "official" document stating that there was no limit I will do so. Other than that I really don't know of a way in which I can prove that there was no study done unless you have any suggestions?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TDUB003, post: 9678917, member: 72580"] I am not a lawyer nor do I claim to be and obviously don't know everything about the law, which is why I posted here for advice. I was actually worried about the fact that my main source of evidence was e-mail which is why I looked up the actual lawsuit in which the limit was stipulated. This post caused me to look up best evidence and if I understand it correctly and the definition is correct it states that modern evidentiary rules usually permit the use of mechanical, electronic, or other similar copy instead of the original. If I need to file an order of information in order to get an "official" document stating that there was no limit I will do so. Other than that I really don't know of a way in which I can prove that there was no study done unless you have any suggestions? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Donut Shop
Grounds for Order of Dismissal?
Top