Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Mustang Forums
2011-2014 Mustangs
Power-Adders
Hellion twin turbo vs. Paxton supercharger
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HELLION TURBO" data-source="post: 14244138" data-attributes="member: 162991"><p>We get a fair number of questions asking to compare our 2011-2014 GT/Boss twin turbo kit vs. a Paxton centrifugal supercharger kit. </p><p></p><p>The main difference is the higher efficiency of a turbo vs. a belt driven supercharger. As shown in the attached dyno graph, the turbo, at a lower boost level, makes more peak power and, more importantly, more average power.</p><p></p><p>(The Paxton GT in this graph is equipped with long tube headers, off-road x pipe, straight through mufflers, Boss intake, and JLT cold air intake--a max effort supercharged combination with street tune---The Hellion Twin Turbo car used is equipped with a 3 inch off road Bassani exhaust with street tune)</p><p></p><p>Less boost means less load on the engine. Not only that, with a turbo, fuel efficiency is increased when not in boost. On the other hand, with a supercharger, the engine is driving a belt even when cruising--wasting power and decreasing fuel efficiency. </p><p></p><p>[ATTACH]18307[/ATTACH]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HELLION TURBO, post: 14244138, member: 162991"] We get a fair number of questions asking to compare our 2011-2014 GT/Boss twin turbo kit vs. a Paxton centrifugal supercharger kit. The main difference is the higher efficiency of a turbo vs. a belt driven supercharger. As shown in the attached dyno graph, the turbo, at a lower boost level, makes more peak power and, more importantly, more average power. (The Paxton GT in this graph is equipped with long tube headers, off-road x pipe, straight through mufflers, Boss intake, and JLT cold air intake--a max effort supercharged combination with street tune---The Hellion Twin Turbo car used is equipped with a 3 inch off road Bassani exhaust with street tune) Less boost means less load on the engine. Not only that, with a turbo, fuel efficiency is increased when not in boost. On the other hand, with a supercharger, the engine is driving a belt even when cruising--wasting power and decreasing fuel efficiency. [ATTACH]18307.vB[/ATTACH] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Mustang Forums
2011-2014 Mustangs
Power-Adders
Hellion twin turbo vs. Paxton supercharger
Top