Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
A Taste of Home
New England
Hey MJ
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mjchip" data-source="post: 3514843" data-attributes="member: 3114"><p>Hey Ken,</p><p></p><p>Now that I have my fuel issues sorted out, I'm going to fill up with 100 octane and shoot for a big number. I'm hoping for around 800rwhp at 18psi. Based on the other times I've been I think I'll see:</p><p></p><p>10psi ~ 650rwhp</p><p>15psi ~ 750rwhp</p><p>18psi ~ 800rwhp</p><p></p><p>At that point I'm finished as I've hit my goal. It's so amazing that when I started out with this car back in Fall of 2002, my goals started out like:</p><p></p><p>1. not going to mess with it at all</p><p>2. I guess I'll do a CAI and catback and shoot for 400rwhp.</p><p>3. well, maybe I'll put a lightning pulley on it and shoot for 475rwhp</p><p>4. with a few more bolt-ons and a lower pulley, maybe I can hit 500rwhp (no ported blowers at this time)</p><p>5. how about a Whipple and shoot for 600rwhp</p><p>6. since I just blew the engine, I'll build a 302 stroker in an aluminum block and go for 650rwhp</p><p>7. now that I've blown the 302, I might as well add bore to the equation and that will take the displacement up to 324cu-in AND since the Whipple won't keep up with that much displacment I might was well build that V8 twin-turbo setup I've always wanted.....with a bunch of boost maybe I can hit 750rwhp.</p><p>8. Now that the smoke has cleared, my goal is 800rwhp and be done with it.</p><p></p><p>Funny, in the back of my mind I keep hearing Jimmy V saying "MJ, beware of da slippery slope!"</p><p></p><p>MJ :bash:</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mjchip, post: 3514843, member: 3114"] Hey Ken, Now that I have my fuel issues sorted out, I'm going to fill up with 100 octane and shoot for a big number. I'm hoping for around 800rwhp at 18psi. Based on the other times I've been I think I'll see: 10psi ~ 650rwhp 15psi ~ 750rwhp 18psi ~ 800rwhp At that point I'm finished as I've hit my goal. It's so amazing that when I started out with this car back in Fall of 2002, my goals started out like: 1. not going to mess with it at all 2. I guess I'll do a CAI and catback and shoot for 400rwhp. 3. well, maybe I'll put a lightning pulley on it and shoot for 475rwhp 4. with a few more bolt-ons and a lower pulley, maybe I can hit 500rwhp (no ported blowers at this time) 5. how about a Whipple and shoot for 600rwhp 6. since I just blew the engine, I'll build a 302 stroker in an aluminum block and go for 650rwhp 7. now that I've blown the 302, I might as well add bore to the equation and that will take the displacement up to 324cu-in AND since the Whipple won't keep up with that much displacment I might was well build that V8 twin-turbo setup I've always wanted.....with a bunch of boost maybe I can hit 750rwhp. 8. Now that the smoke has cleared, my goal is 800rwhp and be done with it. Funny, in the back of my mind I keep hearing Jimmy V saying "MJ, beware of da slippery slope!" MJ :bash: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
A Taste of Home
New England
Hey MJ
Top