Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Donut Shop
How do you guys feel about gun companys not selling to LEO's?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Aerosi665" data-source="post: 12803610" data-attributes="member: 25876"><p>If an officer acted to protect a civilian while off duty, they are not acting as a police officer on duty but rather as a civilian who has taken a situation into their own hands. I am absolutely NOT arguing that officers do not protect people. They do, and I am very thankful for that. I am merely pointing out that according to <strong>US law as defined by the supreme court</strong>, police officers have <strong>NO DUTY</strong> to protect ANY citizen. Period. You may not agree, but that is the law of the land and it cannot be argued as that is the ruling which is still in effect. Please, if you know better and can prove it, point me to the case law which establishes your point of view and I'll gladly reconsider.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Aerosi665, post: 12803610, member: 25876"] If an officer acted to protect a civilian while off duty, they are not acting as a police officer on duty but rather as a civilian who has taken a situation into their own hands. I am absolutely NOT arguing that officers do not protect people. They do, and I am very thankful for that. I am merely pointing out that according to [B]US law as defined by the supreme court[/B], police officers have [B]NO DUTY[/B] to protect ANY citizen. Period. You may not agree, but that is the law of the land and it cannot be argued as that is the ruling which is still in effect. Please, if you know better and can prove it, point me to the case law which establishes your point of view and I'll gladly reconsider. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Donut Shop
How do you guys feel about gun companys not selling to LEO's?
Top